记者:Do you have any evidence that the virus began in a Chinese lab and was maybe released accidentally?
(“你是否有任何证据指向病毒源于中国的实验室,可能是意外漏露的?”)
Milley将军:There’s a lot of rumor and speculation in a wide variety of media, blog sites, etc. It should be no surprise to you that we’ve taken a keen interest in that and we’ve had a lot of intelligence take a hard look at that. And I would just say at this point, it’s inconclusive, although the weight of evidence seems to indicate natural. But we don’t know for certain.
Nice to get your note and I hope everything is well with you and your wife.
Regarding your questions on Wuhan BSL-level 4 lab, I have to say that they are managing very well. No graduate students or any personnel associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology were infected, that is an amazing record for a city initiated the pandemic. They made great discoveries this time: identifying the virus, receptor ACE2, and the neutralized antibody. This time the Chinese scientists are doing a much better job than their performances during the SARS outbreak, but the government was horrible in the initial stage of controlling the virus spread. Please find the source of research done by Scripps scientists published at Nature Medicine showing that the virus was not lab construct or man-made whatsoever. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
美国Scripps 研究所等单位的科学家终于在Nature Medicine发表文章还了石正丽一个清白,当时我所极力反对的对她铺天盖地的阴谋论,比现在还盛,十分可恶。最关键的是这句话:“Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” (“我们的分析清楚地说明新冠病毒不是实验室构建的或者人为操作出来的病毒”)
猜的: 可能无意义, 索引序号
The Bats Behind the Pandemic - WSJwww.wsj.com ? Ideas ? Essay
Apr 9, 2020 - RaTG13 is the name, rank and serial number of an individual horseshoe bat of the species Rhinolophus affinis, or rather of a sample of its feces
回复 '南山悠' 的评论 :
”如果如您所说,您没有在武汉病毒所读书工作过,也就是说,您对武汉病毒所没有直接认识,您并不了解它,那么武汉病毒所 are managing very well 不可能发生泄漏的结论您又是根据什么得出的呢?”
合理质疑
南山悠 发表评论于
回复 “雅美之途”的评论: “我沒在武汉病毒所读过一天书和做过一次实验,我不认识石正丽”。
如果如您所说,您没有在武汉病毒所读书工作过,也就是说,您对武汉病毒所没有直接认识,您并不了解它,那么武汉病毒所 are managing very well 不可能发生泄漏的结论您又是根据什么得出的呢?
现在疫情严重,世界上每天都在死人,无辜的人。找出源头有利于治疗疾病这是共识。 作为科学工作者即使无力帮助找出源头,但起码不该帮助混淆真相,不该在没有证据的情况下就替可疑方做无错断言吧? 这应该是一个科学家起码的良心吧!
但是您怎么就那么肯定武汉病毒所管理毫无纰漏呢? “Regarding your questions on Wuhan BSL-level 4 lab, I have to say that they are managing very well. No graduate students or any personnel associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology were infected, that is an amazing record for a city initiated the pandemic. ” 您的这个结论十分武断。 能理解您对武汉的感情以及和武汉病毒所的渊源,但这不是无视它也许在管理上会有疏漏的可能的理由。 也许您知道内情不便透露,otherwise,您的结论非常不令人信服。
记者:Do you have any evidence that the virus began in a Chinese lab and was maybe released accidentally?
(“你是否有任何证据指向病毒源于中国的实验室,可能是意外漏露的?”)
Milley将军:There’s a lot of rumor and speculation in a wide variety of media, blog sites, etc. It should be no surprise to you that we’ve taken a keen interest in that and we’ve had a lot of intelligence take a hard look at that. And I would just say at this point, it’s inconclusive, although the weight of evidence seems to indicate natural. But we don’t know for certain.
Nice to get your note and I hope everything is well with you and your wife.
Regarding your questions on Wuhan BSL-level 4 lab, I have to say that they are managing very well. No graduate students or any personnel associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology were infected, that is an amazing record for a city initiated the pandemic. They made great discoveries this time: identifying the virus, receptor ACE2, and the neutralized antibody. This time the Chinese scientists are doing a much better job than their performances during the SARS outbreak, but the government was horrible in the initial stage of controlling the virus spread. Please find the source of research done by Scripps scientists published at Nature Medicine showing that the virus was not lab construct or man-made whatsoever. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
美国Scripps 研究所等单位的科学家终于在Nature Medicine发表文章还了石正丽一个清白,当时我所极力反对的对她铺天盖地的阴谋论,比现在还盛,十分可恶。最关键的是这句话:“Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” (“我们的分析清楚地说明新冠病毒不是实验室构建的或者人为操作出来的病毒”)