简体 | 繁体
loading...
海外博客
    • 首页
    • 新闻
    • 读图
    • 财经
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 时尚
    • 旅游
    • 影视
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 论坛
    • 电台
  • 热点
  • 原创
  • 时政
  • 旅游
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 财经
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 时尚
  • 娱乐
  • 历史
  • 文化
  • 社区
  • 帮助
您的位置: 文学城 » 博客 »Henry Ford shuts down study on HCQ for COVID-19

Henry Ford shuts down study on HCQ for COVID-19

2023-01-24 12:34:39

风萧萧_Frank

风萧萧_Frank
以文会友
首页 文章页 文章列表 博文目录
给我悄悄话
打印 被阅读次数

DONATE TODAY Topic:  Michigan Health Watch

Henry Ford study on hydroxychloroquine for COVID quietly shut down

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-health-watch/henry-ford-study-hydroxychloroquine-covid-quietly-shut-down

By  Robin Erb (Email); Michigan Health Watch; January 11, 2021 
 
Promoted in April as the first large-scale drug study on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine to protect against COVID-19, the Detroit-based clinical trial has quietly been iced.

 

Henry Ford Health System officials told Bridge Michigan they could not find enough participants to continue studying whether the drug could help beat back the deadly pandemic. 

Hydroxychloroquine — an antimalarial drug that has also proven useful in treating rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and other inflammatory diseases — briefly produced some excitement last spring when it was promoted as a potential game-changer by President Trump. But early optimism gave way to broader medical studies, with the nation’s top health agencies eventually determining it was not effective in treating or preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus.     

The Henry Ford study (WHIP COVID-19 clinical trial), was to involve 3,000 health care workers, first responders, public transit drivers, or family members of health workers to determine whether hydroxychloroquine would prevent COVID-19 on the frontlines.

“We know that it’s going to be very popular, and we will try to enroll as many people as we can,” Henry Ford cardiologist William W. O’Neill said at the time of the study’s announcement, held with Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan.

But that optimism proved misplaced, with just 624 people signing up. Henry Ford quietly ended the study just before Christmas.

By then, the first U.S.-approved vaccines, by BioNTech/Pfizer, were being shipped across Michigan, using a new technology designed to activate the body’s own immune system to recognize the virus and fight it. A second vaccine, by Moderna, was approved and shipped mid-December.

In ending the hydroxychloroquine study, Henry Ford said it was shifting its focus to vaccines as the “primary strategy of protecting our frontline workers,” according to an emailed statement to Bridge Michigan attributed to Dr. John McKinnon, Henry Ford Health System infectious disease specialist and WHIP COVID-19 co-principal investigator.

High hopes fade 

When the study was first announced in April, Detroiters were desperate. COVID deaths in the city made up nearly a quarter of the state’s total, even though the city has just 7 percent of Michigan’s population. First responders were paying a particularly high price. Days earlier, Mayor Duggan revealed that nearly 500 officers and 100-plus civilians on the police force, and more than 100 city firefighters, remained in quarantine after being exposed to COVID-19.

The mayor and Henry Ford pleaded with officials in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to fast-track approval for the trial.

“If this works out, we'll save the lives of first responders around the world,” Duggan said at the announcement.

Initially, the antimalarial drug appeared promising, with small studies indicating it had some antiviral effects to treat people with COVID-19.

In July, Henry Ford researchers said they found that hydroxychloroquine, on its own or combined with the antibiotic azithromycin, improved survival rates among 2,541 Henry Ford patients hospitalized early with COVID-19. President Trump tweeted approvingly about the study as part of his broader push to find a solution to the deadly virus.

But doubts about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine had already begun to emerge among frontline clinicians, and were confirmed over time by larger studies that failed to show significant evidence of improvement among coronavirus patients. 

And Henry Ford’s research was heavily criticized by scientists and experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci speaking in a Congressional hearing, for falling short of the scientific rigor necessary to draw such conclusions.

Related:

  • Could hydroxychloroquine stop coronavirus? Detroit is first in nation for study
  • Treatment and trials go on, but Michigan doctors split on coronavirus drug

In August, Henry Ford posted a letter defending its work, and insisting its study remained “promising.” Due to a “political climate that...has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible,” the letter said, Henry Ford would no longer comment on hydroxychloroquine “outside the medical community.” 

More news arrived in the fall. The World Health Organization published findings in October that indicated the drug had “little or no effect” on death rates among hospitalized COVID patients. 

An editorial in November in the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Medical Association said Trump’s remarks about the drug contributed to the “misguided use of hydroxychloroquine” in coronavirus cases.  

That same month, a study in the peer-reviewed Lancet medical journal noted no significant difference in COVID rates among those who were taking hydroxychloroquine for other reasons, such as for lupus.

On Dec. 21, Henry Ford alerted the federal database of clinical trials that it was terminating the trial. Henry Ford officials, who declined to be interviewed despite repeated requests, are now notifying trial participants, according to its statement to Bridge. 

In addition to low participation, Henry Ford researchers said they realized the “extremely low rate of infection” among its trial’s participants would make it “extremely unlikely” to discern whether the drug had an effect.

Hospital officials said they are analyzing the data they collected and will submit it to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration when complete.

Coronavirus Tracker | Hospitalizations plunge to lowest level since July, mirroring case drop

January 20, 2023 | Bridge Staff

COVID variant XBB.1.5 may be poised to sweep Michigan: What to know

January 9, 2023 | Mike Wilkinson
 
登录后才可评论.
  • 文学城简介
  • 广告服务
  • 联系我们
  • 招聘信息
  • 注册笔名
  • 申请版主
  • 收藏文学城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日热点

  • 温馨快乐不拘一格的婚礼(1)亮亮妈妈
  • 乌克兰人的悲歌:当泽连斯基押错了宝。蒋公子
  • 普京成功在望/泽莲斯基坚定不移ShalakoW
  • 贸易战的教训国华P
  • 官场情场双丰收——花帅叶剑英雅酷原创
  • Mentor 的影响力风中的苇絮
  • 婷婷走了阿里克斯Y格雷
  • 生活中的小庆幸喵喵叫的苗
  • 文革记忆之三 - 炉工老董之死南半球
  • 被忘却的挹江门如斯
  • 《生万物》:地主与佃农终于穿上了同一条裤子远远的雾
  • 医路心语(70)缺血性心肌病-心衰的第一大病因南山无言
  • 小游德国拜仁(2): 悲情国王的新天鹅堡tiiinywater
  • 相依为命雪晶

一周热点

  • 中国最富有的城市不是北上广深,竟是…..世界在我心中
  • 为什么国内适合养老危言
  • 退个休, 中国也要爆?BeijingGirl1
  • 人性的丑陋凌水
  • 对遗嘱,信托和委托的一些个人看法庸猫0007
  • 我很随意地郑重声明 一下mychina
  • 闲聊六代机、则连斯基、抗战与俄乌战争大荣确
  • 海外华人的“不靠关系”论世事沧桑
  • 抗日战争胜利80周年,海外感思“汉奸”式思维SUDreamers
  • 回乡有感 (一)家乡一碗粉,足以慰风尘两问号
  • 马德里万花筒:植牙巴黎到罗马
  • 盛暑之下房市冷却唐山故乡
  • 2025回国 纪念抗战,两个人的悲剧。。。(图)菲儿天地
  • 炒股奇迹:5年从$70万炒到$2,100万的奇迹老X
Henry Ford shuts...
切换到网页版
风萧萧_Frank

风萧萧_Frank

Henry Ford shuts down study on HCQ for COVID-19

风萧萧_Frank (2023-01-24 12:34:39) 评论 (0)

DONATE TODAY Topic:  Michigan Health Watch

Henry Ford study on hydroxychloroquine for COVID quietly shut down

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-health-watch/henry-ford-study-hydroxychloroquine-covid-quietly-shut-down

By  Robin Erb (Email); Michigan Health Watch; January 11, 2021 
 
Promoted in April as the first large-scale drug study on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine to protect against COVID-19, the Detroit-based clinical trial has quietly been iced.

 

Henry Ford Health System officials told Bridge Michigan they could not find enough participants to continue studying whether the drug could help beat back the deadly pandemic. 

Hydroxychloroquine — an antimalarial drug that has also proven useful in treating rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and other inflammatory diseases — briefly produced some excitement last spring when it was promoted as a potential game-changer by President Trump. But early optimism gave way to broader medical studies, with the nation’s top health agencies eventually determining it was not effective in treating or preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus.     

The Henry Ford study (WHIP COVID-19 clinical trial), was to involve 3,000 health care workers, first responders, public transit drivers, or family members of health workers to determine whether hydroxychloroquine would prevent COVID-19 on the frontlines.

“We know that it’s going to be very popular, and we will try to enroll as many people as we can,” Henry Ford cardiologist William W. O’Neill said at the time of the study’s announcement, held with Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan.

But that optimism proved misplaced, with just 624 people signing up. Henry Ford quietly ended the study just before Christmas.

By then, the first U.S.-approved vaccines, by BioNTech/Pfizer, were being shipped across Michigan, using a new technology designed to activate the body’s own immune system to recognize the virus and fight it. A second vaccine, by Moderna, was approved and shipped mid-December.

In ending the hydroxychloroquine study, Henry Ford said it was shifting its focus to vaccines as the “primary strategy of protecting our frontline workers,” according to an emailed statement to Bridge Michigan attributed to Dr. John McKinnon, Henry Ford Health System infectious disease specialist and WHIP COVID-19 co-principal investigator.

High hopes fade 

When the study was first announced in April, Detroiters were desperate. COVID deaths in the city made up nearly a quarter of the state’s total, even though the city has just 7 percent of Michigan’s population. First responders were paying a particularly high price. Days earlier, Mayor Duggan revealed that nearly 500 officers and 100-plus civilians on the police force, and more than 100 city firefighters, remained in quarantine after being exposed to COVID-19.

The mayor and Henry Ford pleaded with officials in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to fast-track approval for the trial.

“If this works out, we'll save the lives of first responders around the world,” Duggan said at the announcement.

Initially, the antimalarial drug appeared promising, with small studies indicating it had some antiviral effects to treat people with COVID-19.

In July, Henry Ford researchers said they found that hydroxychloroquine, on its own or combined with the antibiotic azithromycin, improved survival rates among 2,541 Henry Ford patients hospitalized early with COVID-19. President Trump tweeted approvingly about the study as part of his broader push to find a solution to the deadly virus.

But doubts about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine had already begun to emerge among frontline clinicians, and were confirmed over time by larger studies that failed to show significant evidence of improvement among coronavirus patients. 

And Henry Ford’s research was heavily criticized by scientists and experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci speaking in a Congressional hearing, for falling short of the scientific rigor necessary to draw such conclusions.

Related:

  • Could hydroxychloroquine stop coronavirus? Detroit is first in nation for study
  • Treatment and trials go on, but Michigan doctors split on coronavirus drug

In August, Henry Ford posted a letter defending its work, and insisting its study remained “promising.” Due to a “political climate that...has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible,” the letter said, Henry Ford would no longer comment on hydroxychloroquine “outside the medical community.” 

More news arrived in the fall. The World Health Organization published findings in October that indicated the drug had “little or no effect” on death rates among hospitalized COVID patients. 

An editorial in November in the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Medical Association said Trump’s remarks about the drug contributed to the “misguided use of hydroxychloroquine” in coronavirus cases.  

That same month, a study in the peer-reviewed Lancet medical journal noted no significant difference in COVID rates among those who were taking hydroxychloroquine for other reasons, such as for lupus.

On Dec. 21, Henry Ford alerted the federal database of clinical trials that it was terminating the trial. Henry Ford officials, who declined to be interviewed despite repeated requests, are now notifying trial participants, according to its statement to Bridge. 

In addition to low participation, Henry Ford researchers said they realized the “extremely low rate of infection” among its trial’s participants would make it “extremely unlikely” to discern whether the drug had an effect.

Hospital officials said they are analyzing the data they collected and will submit it to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration when complete.

Coronavirus Tracker | Hospitalizations plunge to lowest level since July, mirroring case drop

January 20, 2023 | Bridge Staff

COVID variant XBB.1.5 may be poised to sweep Michigan: What to know

January 9, 2023 | Mike Wilkinson