琼斯诉讼案还引发了美国最高法院的一个具有里程碑意义的法律判例，该判例裁定，在位美国总统不能因公职以外的行为免于民事诉讼（a sitting U.S. president is not exempt from civil litigation for acts committed outside of public office）。也就是说明白了，在任总统犯案也于民同罪！【4】。前段川普说他作为总统可以免于任何诉讼显然是违背了这个案例。
米老康 发表评论于 2019-12-19 14:28:12
回复 'tellmey' 的评论 :
"One of Donald Trump’s personal lawyers has argued to judges that the president cannot be investigated by local authorities while he is in office, even if he murdered someone on Fifth Avenue in New York."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
等你一改编,就成了川普律师说的了,就应用你的LINK,法官引用这个例子,然后问川普的律师, 律师只好回答: That is correct
Chin asked Consovoy: “What’s your view on the Fifth Avenue example? Local authorities couldn’t investigate? They couldn’t do anything about it?”
................
“Well, I’m talking about while in office. That’s the hypo[thetical]. Nothing could be done? That is your position?” Chin pressed further.
回复 'tellmey' 的评论 :
回复 'tellmey' 的评论 :
川普的原话是‘I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters.’ 这句话人人都知道是他在吹牛，不会较真。
One of Donald Trump’s personal lawyers has argued to judges that the president cannot be investigated by local authorities while he is in office, even if he murdered someone on Fifth Avenue in New York.
只是个General Statement，没有明说是指川普。但你把这两句话连起来就是了。
回复 'tellmey' 的评论 :
"One of Donald Trump’s personal lawyers has argued to judges that the president cannot be investigated by local authorities while he is in office, even if he murdered someone on Fifth Avenue in New York."
琼斯诉讼案还引发了美国最高法院的一个具有里程碑意义的法律判例，该判例裁定，在位美国总统不能因公职以外的行为免于民事诉讼（a sitting U.S. president is not exempt from civil litigation for acts committed outside of public office）。也就是说明白了，在任总统犯案也于民同罪！【4】。前段川普说他作为总统可以免于任何诉讼显然是违背了这个案例。
