简体 | 繁体
loading...
海外博客
    • 首页
    • 新闻
    • 读图
    • 财经
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 时尚
    • 旅游
    • 影视
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 论坛
    • 电台
  • 热点
  • 原创
  • 时政
  • 旅游
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 财经
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 时尚
  • 娱乐
  • 历史
  • 文化
  • 社区
  • 帮助
您的位置: 文学城 » 博客 »whose Quaker faith preaches living simply “I don’t have an afflu

whose Quaker faith preaches living simply “I don’t have an afflu

2018-09-07 11:01:37

TJKCB

TJKCB
宁静纯我心 感得事物人 写朴实清新. 闲书闲话养闲心,闲笔闲写记闲人;人生无虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
首页 文章页 文章列表 博文目录
给我悄悄话
打印 被阅读次数

whose Quaker faith preaches living simply “I don’t have an affluent lifestyle.”

She made the discovery but a man got the Nobel. A half-century later, she’s won a $3 million prize.

 
Antonia Farzan
5 hrs ago
 
 
 
 
 
Sign on construction site at the assembly site of Ocean Cleanup's System 001, a technology designed to clean up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, on Alameda Island, Alameda, California, August 13, 2018. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
Where did the trash in the Great Pacific Garbage…
The little-known nebula IRAS 05437+2502 billows out among the bright stars and dark dust clouds that surround it in this striking image from the Hubble Space Telescope. It is located in the constellation of Taurus (the Bull), close to the central plane of our Milky Way galaxy. Unlike many of Hubble’s targets, this object has not been studied in detail and its exact nature is unclear. At first glance it appears to be a small, rather isolated region of star formation, and one might assume that the effects of fierce ultraviolet radiation from bright, young stars probably were the cause of the eye-catching shapes of the gas. However, the bright, boomerang-shaped feature may tell a more dramatic tale. The interaction of a high-velocity young star with the cloud of gas and dust may have created this unusually sharp-edged, bright arc. Such a reckless star would have been ejected from the distant young cluster where it was born and would travel at 200,000 kilometers per hour (124,000 miles per hour) or more through the nebula.
Spectacular photos from space
Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1974 (left) and today.© Courtesy of Robin Scagell and the Breakthrough Foundation./ Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1974 (left) and today.

When Jocelyn Bell Burnell began her doctoral studies in physics at Cambridge University in 1965, she was convinced that they had made a mistake by admitting her. “I’m not bright enough for this place,” she now recalls thinking.

Loading...

Load Error

It didn’t help that she was one of only two women in her graduate program. And Cambridge was far more affluent than anywhere she had lived before. Both factors likely contributed to her impostor syndrome, she told The Washington Post, “although of course we didn’t know that term then.”

Bell Burnell’s response was to work as hard as she possibly could. If they threw her out anyway, she figured, she would know that she wasn’t smart enough to be at Cambridge.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

Her diligence ended up paying off. Two years after she arrived at Cambridge, Bell Burnell discovered the first pulsars — a groundbreaking revelation that on Thursday earned her the $3 million special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics, which was previously awarded to Stephen Hawking, among others.
 

It’s a recognition that many feel is long overdue. Bell Burnell’s male PhD supervisor won a Nobel Prize for the same discovery — in 1974.

Like the stars of “Hidden Figures” and DNA researcher Rosalind Franklin, Bell Burnell’s personal story embodies the challenges faced by women in scientific fields. Born in Northern Ireland in 1943, she had to fight to take science classes after the age of 12. “The assumption was that the boys would do science and the girls would do cookery and needlework,” she told The Washington Post. “It was such a firm assumption that it wasn’t even discussed, so there was no choice in the matter.”

By her junior year at the University of Glasgow, she was the only woman enrolled in honors physics. Men would whistle and heckle her when she walked into the lecture hall, she said.

“I learned not to blush,” she said. “If you blushed, they just got louder.”

At Cambridge, the sexism was somewhat more subtle. When Bell Burnell got engaged, the automatic assumption was that she would be dropping out of the program soon, since it was still considered shameful for married women to work. “I got a bit of the sense that because I was quitting, it probably wasn’t worth investing in me anymore,” she said.

Then, in 1967, Bell Burnell alerted her PhD supervisor, Antony Hewish to an “unclassifiable squiggle” on the readout from the radio telescope that she was in charge of monitoring. It was the kind of detail that others might have disregarded or overlooked.

“The source didn’t seem to be man-made — it was moving around with the stars, keeping pace with the constellations,” she told The Guardian in 2009. “We estimated it was 200 light years away, far beyond the sun and planets, but still within our galaxy, the Milky Way.”

As a joke, they labeled it LGM-1, which stood for “Little Green Men.” When Bell Burnell returned to the observatory at 3 a.m. on a freezing cold December night, she had what she called a “Eureka!” moment.

“Wading through miles of chart, I discovered two more of the mysterious signals,” she told The Guardian. “I had, it transpired, discovered the first four examples of an unimagined kind of star — bizarre astral bodies that transmitted radio beams as they spun, which swept through space like the ray of a lighthouse. We called them pulsars.”

The discovery of pulsars ended up being “one of the biggest surprises in the history of astronomy, transforming neutron stars from science fiction to reality in a most dramatic way,” the Breakthrough Prize committee said in a Thursday news release. “Among many later consequences, it led to several powerful tests of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, and to a new understanding of the origin of the heavy elements in the universe.”

When Bell Burnell and her supervisor published a paper detailing their findings in 1968, it attracted international attention. The media didn’t know what to do with a young female scientist who had made a major breakthrough, she told The Guardian.

“Photographers would say, ‘Could you undo some buttons on your jacket, please?'” she recalled. “Journalists asked how many boyfriends I had.”

Then, Hewish, her supervisor, was awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in physics “for his decisive role in the discovery of pulsars.”

Being overlooked by the Nobel committee didn’t surprise her, Bell Burnell told Science News in a recent interview. It was just how things worked back then: Professors, not students, got the credit.

“At that stage, the image people had of science was of a senior man, and it always was a man, with a fleet of younger people working for him,” she said. “And if the project went well, the man got praise. If the project went badly, the man got the blame.”

These days, her Nobel snub is often cited as an example of how women’s contributions to science get erased or overlooked. But Bell Burnell, who currently teaches astronomy at Oxford University, says she isn’t bothered by it.

“I feel I’ve done very well out of not getting a Nobel Prize,” she told The Guardian on Thursday. “If you get a Nobel Prize you have this fantastic week and then nobody gives you anything else. If you don’t get a Nobel Prize you get everything that moves. Almost every year there’s been some sort of party because I’ve got another award. That’s much more fun.”

As for the $3 million, Bell Burnell, whose Quaker faith preaches living simply, doesn’t plan on keeping any of it.

“I don’t need a Porsche or Ferrari,” she told The Washington Post. “I don’t have an affluent lifestyle.”

Instead, the money will go to creating scholarships for people from underrepresented backgrounds who want to study physics. The funds will be administered by the U.K.’s Institute of Physics, and Bell Burnell is hopeful that having a more diverse array of people entering the field will lead to even more new discoveries.

“Maybe,” she joked, “having some people who suffer from impostor syndrome is not a bad thing.”

登录后才可评论.
  • 文学城简介
  • 广告服务
  • 联系我们
  • 招聘信息
  • 注册笔名
  • 申请版主
  • 收藏文学城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日热点

  • 两段触动人心的台词多伦多橄榄树
  • 以色列——被逐出欧洲家园犹太人的无奈归宿(六)橡溪
  • 马德里万花筒:打针惊魂巴黎到罗马
  • 说不好英文怪谁...BeijingGirl1
  • 大幅调整我的极简投资组合硅谷居士
  • 阅兵并不会让国家变得更强大sandstone2
  • 掉进了美人窝 之三:潘虹冯墟
  • 一等美女嫁共军:美国华裔博士眼里的老母亲雅美之途
  • 一场夫妻,一场人生 (完)小花荣
  • 我来谈女人三围中的第一围Lxxyy2014
  • 文学城里的骗子娜佳85
  • 那段专属于我的寂静mychina
  • 老来疯的苦乐海风随意吹
  • 和陌生人订婚mayflower98

一周热点

  • 特朗普会掀中美谈判的桌子吗?北美_原乡人
  • 回国感受之三:东西太便宜了彩叶
  • 退休后选择平层房Ramble House的不利之处如山
  • 理财增长, 但咱越来越‘穷’了BeijingGirl1
  • 为什么说上了60岁需要注意调整资产结构?袋鼠国Bob
  • 退休金缴税公平吗?我生活着
  • 回国杂谈----医疗的优劣(一)布鲁司
  • 滥用信用卡争议程序,夫妇锒铛入狱(图)菲儿天地
  • 中国的西歺之都一哈尔滨世界在我心中
  • 更年期,发量增加,减重十斤,是一种怎样的感觉?巷草
  • 月薪5百元vs年薪百万美元: 一场穿越时光的抉择康赛欧
  • 退休后又摔了帕格尼尼
  • 起了个大早,赶了个晚集。mychina
  • 两段触动人心的台词多伦多橄榄树
whose Quaker faith...
切换到网页版
TJKCB

TJKCB

whose Quaker faith preaches living simply “I don’t have an afflu

TJKCB (2018-09-07 11:01:37) 评论 (0)

whose Quaker faith preaches living simply “I don’t have an affluent lifestyle.”

She made the discovery but a man got the Nobel. A half-century later, she’s won a $3 million prize.

 
Antonia Farzan
5 hrs ago
 
 
 
 
 
Sign on construction site at the assembly site of Ocean Cleanup's System 001, a technology designed to clean up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, on Alameda Island, Alameda, California, August 13, 2018. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
Where did the trash in the Great Pacific Garbage…
The little-known nebula IRAS 05437+2502 billows out among the bright stars and dark dust clouds that surround it in this striking image from the Hubble Space Telescope. It is located in the constellation of Taurus (the Bull), close to the central plane of our Milky Way galaxy. Unlike many of Hubble’s targets, this object has not been studied in detail and its exact nature is unclear. At first glance it appears to be a small, rather isolated region of star formation, and one might assume that the effects of fierce ultraviolet radiation from bright, young stars probably were the cause of the eye-catching shapes of the gas. However, the bright, boomerang-shaped feature may tell a more dramatic tale. The interaction of a high-velocity young star with the cloud of gas and dust may have created this unusually sharp-edged, bright arc. Such a reckless star would have been ejected from the distant young cluster where it was born and would travel at 200,000 kilometers per hour (124,000 miles per hour) or more through the nebula.
Spectacular photos from space
Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1974 (left) and today.© Courtesy of Robin Scagell and the Breakthrough Foundation./ Jocelyn Bell Burnell in 1974 (left) and today.

When Jocelyn Bell Burnell began her doctoral studies in physics at Cambridge University in 1965, she was convinced that they had made a mistake by admitting her. “I’m not bright enough for this place,” she now recalls thinking.

Loading...

Load Error

It didn’t help that she was one of only two women in her graduate program. And Cambridge was far more affluent than anywhere she had lived before. Both factors likely contributed to her impostor syndrome, she told The Washington Post, “although of course we didn’t know that term then.”

Bell Burnell’s response was to work as hard as she possibly could. If they threw her out anyway, she figured, she would know that she wasn’t smart enough to be at Cambridge.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

Her diligence ended up paying off. Two years after she arrived at Cambridge, Bell Burnell discovered the first pulsars — a groundbreaking revelation that on Thursday earned her the $3 million special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics, which was previously awarded to Stephen Hawking, among others.
 

It’s a recognition that many feel is long overdue. Bell Burnell’s male PhD supervisor won a Nobel Prize for the same discovery — in 1974.

Like the stars of “Hidden Figures” and DNA researcher Rosalind Franklin, Bell Burnell’s personal story embodies the challenges faced by women in scientific fields. Born in Northern Ireland in 1943, she had to fight to take science classes after the age of 12. “The assumption was that the boys would do science and the girls would do cookery and needlework,” she told The Washington Post. “It was such a firm assumption that it wasn’t even discussed, so there was no choice in the matter.”

By her junior year at the University of Glasgow, she was the only woman enrolled in honors physics. Men would whistle and heckle her when she walked into the lecture hall, she said.

“I learned not to blush,” she said. “If you blushed, they just got louder.”

At Cambridge, the sexism was somewhat more subtle. When Bell Burnell got engaged, the automatic assumption was that she would be dropping out of the program soon, since it was still considered shameful for married women to work. “I got a bit of the sense that because I was quitting, it probably wasn’t worth investing in me anymore,” she said.

Then, in 1967, Bell Burnell alerted her PhD supervisor, Antony Hewish to an “unclassifiable squiggle” on the readout from the radio telescope that she was in charge of monitoring. It was the kind of detail that others might have disregarded or overlooked.

“The source didn’t seem to be man-made — it was moving around with the stars, keeping pace with the constellations,” she told The Guardian in 2009. “We estimated it was 200 light years away, far beyond the sun and planets, but still within our galaxy, the Milky Way.”

As a joke, they labeled it LGM-1, which stood for “Little Green Men.” When Bell Burnell returned to the observatory at 3 a.m. on a freezing cold December night, she had what she called a “Eureka!” moment.

“Wading through miles of chart, I discovered two more of the mysterious signals,” she told The Guardian. “I had, it transpired, discovered the first four examples of an unimagined kind of star — bizarre astral bodies that transmitted radio beams as they spun, which swept through space like the ray of a lighthouse. We called them pulsars.”

The discovery of pulsars ended up being “one of the biggest surprises in the history of astronomy, transforming neutron stars from science fiction to reality in a most dramatic way,” the Breakthrough Prize committee said in a Thursday news release. “Among many later consequences, it led to several powerful tests of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, and to a new understanding of the origin of the heavy elements in the universe.”

When Bell Burnell and her supervisor published a paper detailing their findings in 1968, it attracted international attention. The media didn’t know what to do with a young female scientist who had made a major breakthrough, she told The Guardian.

“Photographers would say, ‘Could you undo some buttons on your jacket, please?'” she recalled. “Journalists asked how many boyfriends I had.”

Then, Hewish, her supervisor, was awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in physics “for his decisive role in the discovery of pulsars.”

Being overlooked by the Nobel committee didn’t surprise her, Bell Burnell told Science News in a recent interview. It was just how things worked back then: Professors, not students, got the credit.

“At that stage, the image people had of science was of a senior man, and it always was a man, with a fleet of younger people working for him,” she said. “And if the project went well, the man got praise. If the project went badly, the man got the blame.”

These days, her Nobel snub is often cited as an example of how women’s contributions to science get erased or overlooked. But Bell Burnell, who currently teaches astronomy at Oxford University, says she isn’t bothered by it.

“I feel I’ve done very well out of not getting a Nobel Prize,” she told The Guardian on Thursday. “If you get a Nobel Prize you have this fantastic week and then nobody gives you anything else. If you don’t get a Nobel Prize you get everything that moves. Almost every year there’s been some sort of party because I’ve got another award. That’s much more fun.”

As for the $3 million, Bell Burnell, whose Quaker faith preaches living simply, doesn’t plan on keeping any of it.

“I don’t need a Porsche or Ferrari,” she told The Washington Post. “I don’t have an affluent lifestyle.”

Instead, the money will go to creating scholarships for people from underrepresented backgrounds who want to study physics. The funds will be administered by the U.K.’s Institute of Physics, and Bell Burnell is hopeful that having a more diverse array of people entering the field will lead to even more new discoveries.

“Maybe,” she joked, “having some people who suffer from impostor syndrome is not a bad thing.”