引子：一个普通的校友聚会
2025年6月的一个周六上午，阳光洒在加州帕萨迪纳的一间社区中心里。清华大学美国校友会（以下简称清华美校友会）计划在这里举办一场年度聚会，几十个从美国各地赶来的校友们摩拳擦掌，期待重温校园时光。然而，聚会还没开始，气氛就变得诡异起来。会长李明，一个50多岁的房地产开发商，皱着眉头宣布：“今天的议程得改了，来自中国银行（下文简称中行）的‘指导小组’发来了指示，讲演嘉宾得换成他们推荐的人。”台下立刻炸开了锅，有人低声嘀咕：“这又是哪一出啊？咱们在美国开会，还得听北京的？”这场聚会从此蒙上了一层阴影，而这只是一个更深层故事的开始。
第一章：校友会的“中国式”管理
清华美校友会成立于1990年代初，最初是个松散的组织，靠校友自发捐款和自愿服务维持。成员们在美国各行各业打拼，有的成了工程师，有的成了教授，还有人开起了餐馆，大家聚在一起聊聊母校，捐点钱资助贫困学生，日子过得挺惬意。可自从2015年左右，中行开始插手，事情就变了味。
据说中行看中了校友会的“资源”——这些在美国混得风生水起的校友们，背后都有人脉和钱。中行通过在北京的“母会”施压，要求校友会把财务和活动计划报备给他们，还派了个“指导小组”常驻美国，名义上是“协助管理”，实则是盯着每个人的一举一动。会长李明私下跟老朋友吐槽：“我感觉自己不是在管校友会，是在给中行当免费打工，报表都得按他们的格式填，连捐款去哪都得他们点头。”
这种“中国式”官僚作风让校友会失去了原本的自由。每次开会，指导小组的代表总爱旁敲侧击，询问谁最近跟美国政府部门有联系，或者谁的生意做得太大，惹人注意。有人开玩笑说：“这哪是校友会，简直是中行的海外情报站！”可笑归可笑，背后却藏着让人不寒而栗的现实。
第二章：偏见与歧视的阴影
这种控制不仅让校友会失去了自主权，还带来了偏见和歧视。指导小组对一些“异类”校友格外关注，比如张华，一个在硅谷做AI研究的华裔教授。张华因为跟美国国防部合作过项目，成了中行的“敏感人物”。每次聚会，他都被要求“回避敏感话题”，甚至有次被直接劝退，说他的存在“可能影响组织形象”。张华气得直摇头：“我辛辛苦苦在美国纳税，照样被当间谍看待，这算哪门子校友会？”
更离谱的是，指导小组还暗中给校友们贴标签。有人因为捐款少被冷嘲热讽，有人因为在美国出生（而不是中国大陆）被质疑“不够爱国”。这种内耗让校友会内部关系紧张，原本的兄弟情谊变成了明争暗斗。有人忍不住在微信群里发牢骚：“这哪是校友会啊，简直是政治筛选场！”
第三章：隐私权被侵犯的真相
隐私权的侵犯是校友会最大的痛点。中行指导小组要求每个成员填一份详细的个人信息表，包括收入、家庭住址、甚至社交媒体账号。有人拒绝填，结果被警告“可能影响会员资格”。更夸张的是，有校友发现自己的捐款记录和个人数据被中行拿去跟中国国内的数据库对比，怀疑是为了“监控”海外华人的动态。
李明曾无意间透露，指导小组还雇了私人侦探，调查一些“活跃分子”的生活细节。比如陈丽，一个在纽约开律师事务所的校友，因为公开批评中行政策，家里突然被不明身份的人“拜访”，笔记本电脑还莫名其妙失灵。她气愤地对朋友说：“这是在美国啊！他们凭什么这么干？”
这种行为显然触犯了美国法律。根据《第四修正案》（Fourth Amendment），美国公民有权免受无理搜查和扣押，私人数据未经法庭许可不得随意获取。2018年的“卡彭特诉美国案”（Carpenter v. United States）明确规定，政府或私人机构若想获取个人电子数据，必须有搜查令。可中行作为中国国有银行，豁免于美国法律管辖，其行为在美国却无人监管，形成了法律盲区。
第四章：美国法律的碰撞与无力
美国法律对这种跨境干预束手无策。清华美校友会是私人组织，中行又不是美国实体，联邦调查局（FBI）很难直接介入。2018年，美国司法部启动的“中国行动计划”（China Initiative）曾试图打击中国政府对美华人社区的渗透，但因缺乏证据和过度针对华裔科学家而饱受争议，最终在2022年被叫停。
相比之下，中国政策却在暗中支持这种控制。《中华人民共和国数据安全法》（2021年生效）要求境内外机构配合国家安全需求，提供个人信息。这让中行有“法律依据”监控校友会成员，而美国法律无法 extraterritorial（域外）执法，形成了政策上的不对等。
第五章：一个校友的觉醒
故事的高潮发生在2025年6月的那场聚会后。张华决定站出来，他联合几名校友，向加州北区联邦地区法院提起诉讼，指控中行侵犯隐私权和歧视行为。诉讼书中引用了《民权法案》（Civil Rights Act of 1964），主张校友会成员作为美国居民，享有平等对待的权利。
庭审中，法官引用了“布朗诉教育委员会案”（Brown v. Board of Education, 1954），强调歧视行为无论在何种组织中都是非法的。同时，律师团队援引“莱利诉加州案”（Riley v. California, 2014），指出未经许可获取电子数据属违法。最终，法院下令中行指导小组停止干预校友会活动，但由于中行不属美国管辖，执行效果有限。
尾声：自由的曙光与幽默的免责
这场诉讼让清华美校友会成员重新找回了些许自由。李明感慨道：“总算不用天天看中行脸色了！”张华也计划成立一个独立校友会，彻底摆脱官僚控制。不过，变化不会一夜之间发生，校友们依然小心翼翼，生怕再次被“盯上”。
法律免责声明: 这故事根据真实案例虚构而成，别当真！如果中行真来找麻烦，赶紧找律师，别指望我救你——我是虚幻的天外来客，连地球资格都没有！
English Version: The Shackles of the Alumni Association—A Story of a Chinese Prestigious University’s Alumni Group in the U.S.
Prologue: An Ordinary Alumni Gathering
It’s a sunny Saturday morning in June 2025, and the rays are bouncing off a community center in Pasadena, California. The Tsinghua University Alumni Association in the U.S. (let’s call it Tsinghua USA) is gearing up for its annual bash. Dozens of alums have rolled in from all over the States, pumped to relive their college days. But before the party even kicks off, the vibe turns weird. President Li Ming, a 50-something real estate big shot, frowns and announces, “We’ve gotta switch up the agenda. The ‘guidance team’ from the Bank of China (BOC, for short) sent orders, and the speaker’s gotta be their pick.” The room erupts—people mutter under their breath, “What’s this nonsense? We’re in the U.S., and we still gotta bow to Beijing?” That gathering was doomed from the start, just the tip of a much bigger iceberg.
Chapter One: The “Chinese-Style” Management
Tsinghua USA kicked off in the ‘90s, a chill outfit run by alums chipping in cash and volunteering. These folks—engineers, professors, even restaurant owners—built lives across the U.S., meeting up to swap stories about their alma mater and pitch in for needy students. Life was good. But around 2015, the BOC muscled in, and things went south.
Word is the BOC eyed the alumni’s “resources”—these successful alums with connections and deep pockets. Through pressure from the “mother chapter” in Beijing, the BOC demanded financial reports and activity plans, even stationing a “guidance team” in the U.S. They called it “helping out,” but it felt more like babysitting every move. Li Ming griped to an old buddy, “I don’t feel like I’m running an alumni group—I’m basically BOC’s free intern, filling out their fancy forms and begging for approval on every donation.”
This “Chinese-style” bureaucracy killed the group’s freedom. At every meeting, the guidance team’s reps would fish around, asking who’s been chatting with U.S. government folks or whose business is getting too big. Someone joked, “This ain’t an alumni club—it’s BOC’s overseas spy hub!” Funny, sure, but the reality gave everyone the chills.
Chapter Two: The Shadow of Bias and Discrimination
The control didn’t just strip away autonomy—it brought bias and discrimination. The guidance team zeroed in on “outliers,” like Zhang Hua, a Silicon Valley AI prof. Since he’d worked with the U.S. Department of Defense, he was on their radar. At meetings, he was told to “avoid sensitive topics” and once got flat-out asked to leave, with the excuse that he “might hurt the group’s image.” Zhang Hua threw up his hands, “I pay taxes here and still get treated like a spy—what kind of alumni club is this?”
Even worse, the team started labeling people. Some got snickered at for donating too little; others, born in the U.S. instead of mainland China, were questioned for not being “patriotic enough.” This infighting turned the once-tight-knit group into a battlefield of backstabbing. One alum vented in the WeChat group, “This isn’t an alumni club—it’s a political purge zone!”
Chapter Three: The Truth About Privacy Invasion
The biggest sore spot? Privacy breaches. The BOC guidance team demanded detailed info from every member—income, home address, even social media accounts. Refuse to fill it out, and you’d get a warning about “risking membership.” Crazy part? Some alums found their donation records and personal data cross-checked with databases back in China, likely for “monitoring” overseas Chinese.
Li Ming let slip that the team even hired private investigators to dig into “active members.” Take Chen Li, a New York lawyer who openly criticized BOC policies—her home got a surprise “visit” from unknown folks, and her laptop mysteriously crashed. She fumed to a friend, “We’re in America! Who do they think they are?”
This clearly breaks U.S. law. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and personal data can’t be accessed without a warrant. The 2018 “Carpenter v. United States” case ruled that electronic data collection by government or private entities needs court approval. But the BOC, as a Chinese state bank, sidesteps U.S. jurisdiction, creating a legal gray area with zero oversight.
Chapter Four: The Clash and Helplessness of U.S. Law
U.S. law is powerless against this cross-border meddling. Tsinghua USA is a private group, and the BOC isn’t a U.S. entity, so the FBI can’t easily step in. The 2018 “China Initiative” by the Justice Department aimed to curb Chinese government infiltration in U.S. Chinese communities but faced backlash for targeting Asian scientists with shaky evidence, leading to its 2022 shutdown.
Meanwhile, Chinese policy backs this control. The “Data Security Law of the People’s Republic of China” (effective 2021) mandates that domestic and foreign entities cooperate with national security, giving the BOC a “legal basis” to monitor members. U.S. law can’t enforce extraterritorial jurisdiction, creating a policy mismatch.
Chapter Five: An Alum’s Awakening
The turning point came after that June 2025 gathering. Zhang Hua stepped up, teaming with other alums to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging privacy violations and discrimination. The lawsuit cited the Civil Rights Act of 1964, arguing that members, as U.S. residents, deserve equal treatment.
In court, the judge referenced “Brown v. Board of Education” (1954), declaring discrimination illegal in any organization. The legal team also leaned on “Riley v. California” (2014), noting unauthorized data access is unlawful. The court ordered the BOC guidance team to back off, but enforcement was shaky since the BOC isn’t under U.S. control.
Epilogue: A Glimmer of Freedom and a Humorous Disclaimer
The lawsuit gave Tsinghua USA members a taste of freedom again. Li Ming sighed, “Finally, no more kissing BOC’s boots!” Zhang Hua plans to start an independent alumni group, free from bureaucracy. But change won’t happen overnight—alums still tread carefully, wary of being “watched” again.
Legal Disclaimer: This story’s pure fiction—don’t take it seriously! If the BOC comes knocking, get a lawyer, not me—I’m just Max star to save you!
Vocabulary, Phrases, Idioms, and Slang Explained for Non-Native English Learners
This section breaks down key English terms, phrases, idioms, and slang used in the story, tailored for non-native speakers at an elementary level. Each explanation includes simple definitions, examples, and tips to use them naturally.
1. Gearing Up
• Meaning: Getting ready or preparing for something with excitement.
• Example: “We’re gearing up for the big game tomorrow!”
• Tip: Use it for events or tasks you’re pumped about. Sounds casual and energetic.
2. Kicks Off
• Meaning: Starts or begins something.
• Example: “The party kicks off at 7 PM.”
• Tip: Great for informal contexts like events. Replace “starts” for a livelier tone.
3. Went South
• Meaning: Turned bad or failed.
• Example: “The plan went south when it started raining.”
• Tip: A common idiom for when things go wrong. Use it to sound natural in storytelling.
4. Muscled In
• Meaning: Forcibly took control or got involved.
• Example: “He muscled in on our project and took credit.”
• Tip: Use for situations where someone pushes their way in aggressively.
5. Deep Pockets
• Meaning: Having a lot of money.
• Example: “That company has deep pockets to fund new ideas.”
• Tip: A business slang term. Perfect for talking about wealthy people or organizations.
6. Griped
• Meaning: Complained or grumbled.
• Example: “She griped about the long wait at the store.”
• Tip: Informal way to say complain. Adds a whiny, relatable vibe.
7. Zeroed In
• Meaning: Focused on or targeted something/someone.
• Example: “The teacher zeroed in on the student who was late.”
• Tip: Use for attention or scrutiny. Sounds dynamic in narratives.
8. Threw Up His Hands
• Meaning: Gave up or showed frustration.
• Example: “He threw up his hands when the computer crashed again.”
• Tip: A vivid idiom for exasperation. Pair with a gesture for effect.
9. Vent
• Meaning: To express frustration or anger.
• Example: “I need to vent about my bad day.”
• Tip: Casual and emotional. Good for friends or informal chats.
10. Tread Carefully
• Meaning: Act cautiously to avoid trouble.
• Example: “You should tread carefully around that topic.”
• Tip: A polite way to warn someone. Works in serious or risky situations.
11. Wary
• Meaning: Cautious or suspicious.
• Example: “She was wary of the stranger’s offer.”
• Tip: Use to show distrust. Adds depth to character emotions.
12. Knocking
• Meaning: Visiting or confronting (here, metaphorically).
• Example: “If trouble comes knocking, call me!”
• Tip: Informal and playful. Often used in warnings or jokes.
13. Pure Fiction
• Meaning: Completely made-up, not real.
• Example: “That movie is pure fiction, not history.”
• Tip: Common in disclaimers. Pair with “don’t take it seriously” for humor.
14. Kissing Boots
• Meaning: Submissively obeying or flattering someone powerful.
• Example: “He’s always kissing the boss’s boots for a promotion.”
• Tip: A sarcastic idiom. Use it to criticize someone’s behavior.
15. Shaky Evidence
• Meaning: Weak or unreliable proof.
• Example: “The case fell apart due to shaky evidence.”
• Tip: Legal or formal context. Shows doubt in arguments.
This list helps non-native learners grasp the story’s language while building conversational skills. Practice these in daily talks to sound like a native speaker!
really?
