Alan Dershowitz 是川普的(前)律师之一好么？
他是三天两头上 Fox 为川普辩护的退休人士，而且早就不是哈佛教授，十年都不止了。
硅谷工匠 发表评论于
拜总2020年封口费是facebook直接下拨的，比较值啊。
漁富 发表评论于
故國思維，法氓法盲！
xyz66 发表评论于
敢情你是“缺啥叫嚣啥”啊！
xyz66 发表评论于
楼下的“TexusIns02”：
你这满嘴臭哄哄的，从哪个号子里冒出来的？
xyz66 发表评论于
连自由派的哈佛法学院著名教授Liberal legal legend Alan Dershowitz 都看不下去了， Here is a summary of what he wrote for DailyMail.com about the guilty verdict against former President Donald Trump:
Long before Donald Trump’s hush-money trial concluded, I predicted that his conviction wss a forgone conclusion – despite the obvious weakness of the case against him.
Had the prosecution been brought in another part of the country, or even in another part of New York State, which was more fairly balanced with anti and pro-Trump voters, I am in little doubt that the outcome would have been different.
But instead, on Thursday, Trump became the first former president to be found guilty of a crime – convicted on all 34 flimsy counts of ‘falsifying business records.
Why? Because this case was tried in Manhattan, where practically every man on the street wants to keep one Donald Trump out of the White House.
Perhaps the most important function of an independent jury in criminal trials is to keep a check on the biases of prosecutors and judges.
But for this constitutional protection to work, jurors must not be biased themselves against a defendant.
It’s quite apparent that this essential protection was absent.
Nor did this case seem to be based on the evidence or the law. In fact, I saw no credible evidence of a crime.
The case brought by District Attorney Alvin Bragg – elected to ‘Get Trump’ – was so woefully weak on the facts and the law that it makes Trump’s conviction even more dangerous.
It now means that future prosecutors can concoct extremely weak cases against political opponents and be assured of a conviction – albeit if they just pick the right venue and select the right jurors.
This trial was without precedent.
Never in American history has anyone ever been prosecuted for – as Trump’s defense argued was the case – erroneous bookkeeping made by a company underling who failed to disclose the payment of ‘hush money’.
What there is plenty of precedent for is… the payment of hush money.
Stormy女早在2011年就威胁老川要曝光the alleged one-time encounter in a hotel room in 2006， 她自己也说是自愿的（典型的she-said-he-said scenario). 这种要挟对社会名人还少吗？ 还记得选前关于比尔 克林顿的各种womanizing problems 曝光吗?
