简体 | 繁体
loading...
海外博客
    • 首页
    • 新闻
    • 读图
    • 财经
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 时尚
    • 旅游
    • 影视
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 论坛
    • 电台
  • 热点
  • 原创
  • 时政
  • 旅游
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 财经
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 时尚
  • 娱乐
  • 历史
  • 文化
  • 社区
  • 帮助
您的位置: 文学城 » 博客 »Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

2007-11-05 15:39:26

羽宁

羽宁
首页 文章页 文章列表 博文目录
给我悄悄话
打印 被阅读次数

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Posted by Nick Timiraos

nullResearchers shed a little more light on what went so badly wrong with Pfizer’s torcetrapib (pictured) during a presentation at the American Heart Association’s confab in Orlando.

Besides boosting HDL, or good, cholesterol levels, torcetrapib sharply increased risks of death during trials. Pfizer spiked the mammoth drug-development program last December after torcetrapib spurred an increase in deaths and heart problems in patients taking the drug in combination with Lipitor. The study of 15,000 patients, overseen by the Heart Research Institute in Sydney, saw risk of death increase by 58% and risks of heart attack or other heart problems increase by 25% in the combination therapy versus Lipitor alone.

What went haywire? Dr. Philip Barter, the institute’s lead researcher, suggested that torcetrapib boosted aldosterone, a hormone involved in the regulation of blood pressure. But he cautioned that still more research must be done to explain how that could have made the drug so unsafe.

Merck and Roche have been developing similar drugs, so-called CETP inhibitors, and had been awaiting details about torcetrapib. Steven Nissen, head of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, told Bloomberg that torcetrapib “has a bizarre, off-target toxicity that caused it to produce harm and concealed the benefit” of raising good cholesterol. “Now there’s a race on,” he said. “We can get back on the horse and try again.”

An editorial in today’s New England Journal of Medicine warned against reading too much into the torcetrapib’s failure: “In any case, it is premature to announce the death of CETP inhibitors on the basis of the torcetrapib experience alone.”

Steve Ryder, Pfizer’s head of torcetrapib research and development, told Dow Jones Newswires: “There are many questions that still remain.”

And that burden will hang over the other experimental drugs that aim to raise good cholesterol as torcetrapib did. “The whole fiasco with torcetrapib means that we’re going to have to be even more cautious with any of its cousins before they come to market,” Sharonne Hayes, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, told Bloomberg. “It’s going to be a much higher bar.”

登录后才可评论.
  • 文学城简介
  • 广告服务
  • 联系我们
  • 招聘信息
  • 注册笔名
  • 申请版主
  • 收藏文学城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日热点

  • 为什么说上了60岁需要注意调整资产结构?袋鼠国Bob
  • Costco 买,自己做,省钱 好吃 健康菲儿天地
  • 在中国吃的最满意的一餐 - 北京首都机场吃到国宴菜mamiya67
  • 夫妻之道(11)-- 生活为什么会一地鸡毛?Oasisflying
  • 【偶遇】出差遇到的名人laopika
  • 穿最少的衣服开最快的车铃兰听风
  • 特朗普推出簽證費政策:吃准了你必來美國的心理Billzhou
  • 苹果迷途知返,川普居功至伟蛇形刁手
  • 成都散记(4)高新园区林间溪
  • 抓痒的手和抓拍的手机:一场本可避免的校园悲剧北美原野
  • 断头将军与他的孤胆美妻:抗战时的生死绝恋赵大夫话吧
  • 美股市场的投机风潮再起lionhill
  • 美国那么横,世界为何还是喜欢它?朱头山
  • 里斯本八日游记 (三)jguojob

一周热点

  • 特朗普会掀中美谈判的桌子吗?北美_原乡人
  • 回国感受之三:东西太便宜了彩叶
  • 理财增长, 但咱越来越‘穷’了BeijingGirl1
  • 退休后选择平层房Ramble House的不利之处如山
  • 退休金缴税公平吗?我生活着
  • 回国杂谈----医疗的优劣(一)布鲁司
  • 更年期,发量增加,减重十斤,是一种怎样的感觉?巷草
  • 月薪5百元vs年薪百万美元: 一场穿越时光的抉择康赛欧
  • 中国的西歺之都一哈尔滨世界在我心中
  • 退休后又摔了帕格尼尼
  • 起了个大早,赶了个晚集。mychina
  • 为什么说上了60岁需要注意调整资产结构?袋鼠国Bob
  • 滥用信用卡争议程序,夫妇锒铛入狱(图)菲儿天地
  • 大盘QQQ 来到的重要路口,下面的展望三心三意
Pfizer’s Failure in...
切换到网页版
羽宁

羽宁

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

羽宁 (2007-11-05 15:39:26) 评论 (2)

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Posted by Nick Timiraos

nullResearchers shed a little more light on what went so badly wrong with Pfizer’s torcetrapib (pictured) during a presentation at the American Heart Association’s confab in Orlando.

Besides boosting HDL, or good, cholesterol levels, torcetrapib sharply increased risks of death during trials. Pfizer spiked the mammoth drug-development program last December after torcetrapib spurred an increase in deaths and heart problems in patients taking the drug in combination with Lipitor. The study of 15,000 patients, overseen by the Heart Research Institute in Sydney, saw risk of death increase by 58% and risks of heart attack or other heart problems increase by 25% in the combination therapy versus Lipitor alone.

What went haywire? Dr. Philip Barter, the institute’s lead researcher, suggested that torcetrapib boosted aldosterone, a hormone involved in the regulation of blood pressure. But he cautioned that still more research must be done to explain how that could have made the drug so unsafe.

Merck and Roche have been developing similar drugs, so-called CETP inhibitors, and had been awaiting details about torcetrapib. Steven Nissen, head of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, told Bloomberg that torcetrapib “has a bizarre, off-target toxicity that caused it to produce harm and concealed the benefit” of raising good cholesterol. “Now there’s a race on,” he said. “We can get back on the horse and try again.”

An editorial in today’s New England Journal of Medicine warned against reading too much into the torcetrapib’s failure: “In any case, it is premature to announce the death of CETP inhibitors on the basis of the torcetrapib experience alone.”

Steve Ryder, Pfizer’s head of torcetrapib research and development, told Dow Jones Newswires: “There are many questions that still remain.”

And that burden will hang over the other experimental drugs that aim to raise good cholesterol as torcetrapib did. “The whole fiasco with torcetrapib means that we’re going to have to be even more cautious with any of its cousins before they come to market,” Sharonne Hayes, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, told Bloomberg. “It’s going to be a much higher bar.”