卡尔森说1月6日抗议是和平的。 连共和党的议员都谴责他重写历史。那些议员当时在场,生命受到威胁。
“With regard to the presentation on Fox News last night, I want to associate myself entirely with the opinion of the chief of the Capitol Police about what happened on Jan. 6,” McConnell said Tuesday, adding that in his view, Manger “correctly describes what most of us witnessed firsthand on Jan. 6.”
“It was a mistake, in my view, for Fox News to depict this in a way that is completely at variance with what our chief law enforcement official here at Capitol thinks,” he added.
Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., told CNN, “To somehow put that in the same category as a permitted peaceful protest is just a lie.”
"I was here," Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told Politico. "It was not peaceful. It was an abomination. You’re entitled to believe what you want in America, but you can’t resort to violence to try to convince others of your point of view."
“The American people saw what happened on Jan. 6." Utah Sen. Mitt Romney said to reporters. "They’ve seen the people that got injured. They saw the damage to the building. You can’t hide the truth by selectively picking a few minutes out of tapes and saying this is what went on.
"It’s so absurd. It’s nonsense," Romey continued. "It’s a very dangerous thing to do, to suggest that attacking the Capitol of the United States is in any way acceptable and it’s anything other than a serious crime, against democracy and against our country.
"Trying to normalize that behavior is dangerous and disgusting," Romney added.
And Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told NBC that Carlson’s claims are “bull****.”
"When you see police officers assaulted, all of that ... if you were just a tourist, you should've probably lined up at the visitors' center and came in on an orderly basis,” he said.
法庭文件显示, 卡尔森(Tucker Carlson)主张解雇Fox台的白宫记者,因为那个记者去核实川普的选举舞弊论。 卡尔森说,这个记者的行为伤害了公司,公司的股价下跌,“这不是开玩笑”。
There's a text in particular from Tucker Carlson, and he is suggesting here that a FOX News White House correspondent should be fired for fact-checking a Trump claim about the election. He says: "Please get her fired. I'm actually shocked. It needs to be stopped immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke."
一个川普的前支持者叫Ray Epps,他1月6日去了DC, 但没有进入国会大厦。因此没有被起诉。塔克•卡尔森就在福克斯电台上散布阴谋论,说Ray Epps是替联邦调查局工作,故意煽动暴乱,然后以此为借口镇压保守派人士。 Ray Epps因此受到死亡威胁。害的他和太太卖了房子和生意躲起来。这个Ray Epps很生气,他说很多参加暴乱的,明明是听了福克斯台包括卡尔森的煽动才去的。 卡尔森却倒打一耙。 连代理暴乱者案子的律师,都告诉卡尔森,不要再发表这些无稽之谈。
树没皮怎办 发表评论于
当一个主持人,撒谎成性,台前公开讲的,和背后私下讲的完全不一样,这是个骗子,为了流量和股份的骗子,对这样骗子的言论,俺当然都要打问号,fact check, 而不是盲信。
他在公开节目中,慷慨激昂,义愤填膺,散布大选舞弊论,很多人受了他的煽动去了DC,但他私下说,选举舞弊论 "absurd" "shockingly reckless", "There wasn't enough fraud to change the outcome".
他说1月6日那天抗议是很和平美丽的一天,没有暴力。连暴乱当天在场的共和党议员都谴责他。
他说是FBI的探子挑起的暴乱,让因为参与暴乱被起诉的被告的律师,都劝他不要再讲了。
fact check: 他是前30个冲进国会的其中的一个。最初被起诉6项罪名。他和检方最后达成认罪协议,认了其中一条罪,于2021年11月被法官判41个月。他于今年5月25日被提前释放,主要因为他在监狱表现好。 Chansley received an early release, in part, because of his good behavior while in prison, says Albert Watkins, who represented Chansley through his plea and sentencing.
"Mr. Chansley can now move forward with his life. For that I applaud the BOP (即Bureau of Prison美国建议管理局," Watkins told NPR in a statement. 并不是他被无罪释放。
--------------------
密林深处 发表评论于 2023-05-26 07:16:08
牛面男因为Tucker Carson的视频给放了,没有暴力行为就不应该被判罪。
树没皮怎办 发表评论于
他被判的法条:
18 USC 2384: Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808 ; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623 ; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148 .)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §6 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §6, 35 Stat. 1089 ).