"Those [9/11] are horrific attacks. There's no question about it, that's not a debatable thing. Innocent Americans lost their lives that day, we all mourn their deaths ... And I think it's quite disgusting that people even question that and want to debate that."
And, yes. I too, am disappointed, that facts, reason, and logic had no effect on you.
回复 'Chalet' 的评论 : HCC就是在诡辩，你就不再搭理它了，他连文字都读不懂，颠倒黑白指鹿为马，就是一个非法滞留的脑残，拿不上绿卡气急败坏，让 Moron love himself ！
回复 'HCC' 的评论 : 我说的是MSL和伊斯兰世界，不是她的国家来源，你懂的，再挖就有狡辩之嫌了。最后一次回复你，move on 吧，讨论得也差不多了
回复 'HCC' 的评论 : 你是睁眼说瞎话，为猪党洗地也不能这么不要脸，你这个孙子看不懂还是装傻子，谁说AOC和他哥生子，句号你这个孙子都看不懂吗？你就别在这里装傻充愣满嘴CNN的脚本啦。Omar热爱美国？you are bullshit ! Omar would have already lost her head in the Middle East. The US govt at taxpayers expense rescued her ass of from a spot where she had fewer rights than vermine. If Omar thinks she has made a bad move, nobody will interfere with her nobody will stop her from returning to the Sithole of her choice. Maybe you can join her in going to the Somali camp. Hopefully soon and you won't have to be concerned with websites like this. Your kind are not popular there. Maybe wave some Chinese flags on the street. GO LOVE YOURSELF !
回复 'HCC' 的评论 : “you do not need to smear her and frame her for something she is not. ”
Sorry to disappoint you, HCC. I was just quoting what you quoted.
I do not smear or frame anybody. But if you say something, you better know what you mean. Especially if on record.
人总要对自己说的话负责吧？她说了啥，她自己负责。您老去给洗地？洗不干净，就来骂我？我哪句话smear her and frame her? 敬请举例。
>>>If you buy the lip service, it is your freedom to do so. But it does not give me a reason to respect your intellect.
If you want to fabricate misinformation, and believe in distorted political propaganda, sure, that is entirely your choice. Nonetheless, it does not change the reality:
Ilhan Omar is not anti-America, whatsoever.
You don’t need to agree with her political views. You don't need to vote for her or follow her. But, at a minimum, you do not need to smear her and frame her for something she is not.
I thought you are a person who is capable of reason and logic. Apparently, I was mistaken.
＂I believe, as an immigrant, I probably love this country more than anyone that is naturally born,” Omar said.＂
“No lies will stamp out my love for this country or my resolve to make our union more perfect,” she said.
后来来美国后我看了一本小书（小说），waiting for the rain, by Sheila Gordon, 就是讲 South Africa当时黑白之间的矛盾：一对好朋友，一白一黑，一起在白孩叔叔家的农场长大，之后黑孩意识到了自己地位的低下，意欲改变现状，开始投身革命参加暴动，而白孩则被征入伍成为白人政府的军警一员，镇压暴动...之后他们在一次暴动中认出了对方，写得太感人了，我黑白两边都比较同情，如果有兴趣你可以看看，让自己有些感性认识 ...Cover 上写道：
In the grip of South Africa apartheid, can this friendship Survive?
HCC 发表评论于 2019-07-19 16:56:14 Omar她说的是： ... “CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”
您老，那么Omar的立场还不明显吗？CAIR（Council of American-Islamic Relations)认为some people did something。您老认为Omar是同意CAIR这个说法，还是谴责这个说法？
In post-apartheid South Africa, unemployment has been extremely high as the country has struggled with many changes. While many blacks have risen to middle or upper classes, the overall unemployment rate of black people worsened between 1994 and 2003 by official metrics, but declined significantly using expanded definitions.
Poverty among whites, previously rare, increased. In addition, the current government has struggled to achieve the monetary and fiscal discipline to ensure both redistribution of wealth and economic growth. The United Nations (UN) Human Development Index (HDI) of South Africa fell from 1995 to 2005, while it was steadily rising until the mid-1990s, before recovering its 1995 peak in 2013. This is in large part attributable to the South African HIV/AIDS pandemic which saw South African life expectancy fall from a high point of 62.25 years in 1992 to a low of 52.57 in 2005, and the failure of the government to take steps to address it in the early years.
In May 2008, riots left over 60 people dead. The Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates over 100,000 people were driven from their homes. The targets were mainly legal and illegal migrants and refugees seeking asylum, but a third of the victims were South African citizens.
In a 2006 survey, the South African Migration Project concluded that South Africans are more opposed to immigration than anywhere else in the world. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees in 2008 reported over 200,000 refugees applied for asylum in South Africa, almost four times as many as the year before.
回复 'HCC' 的评论 : 别在这里胡喷了你，MSL恐怖分子用了五架飞机撞毁双塔、五角大楼，死亡数千人还有多少个家庭遭遇了灭顶之灾。那个MSL奥玛微笑说“someone did something”what the f**k ???"这是US Congress disgusted with this b*t*h.这些真相事实就是证明了她怀恨美国，是MSL恐怖分子在美国的代理人，反对她们都是有原因的，她们阻扰ice抓捕有犯罪前科的非法移民，鼓动anti—America，烧毁美国国旗，破坏Law and Order等等，那是因为她们只反对老川？就你的这些月经贴都是CNN的脚本，别在这里浑水摸鱼了，现在沉默的大多数都开始放发声了，你就别在这里现眼了。
回复 '有问求解' 的评论 : 谢谢你对民权运动的详细法律补充！很惊艳
>>>Ilhan Omar on 911: some people did something...
“Far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen, and frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it,” Omar said at the event. “CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”
她说的没错 － 不过被人暗算扭解了她的话好用来打击她。她本人要说的完全是另一回事。
见： Column: No, CNN, Rep. Ilhan Omar did not minimize 9/11
又见：Republicans are taking Ilhan Omar’s comments on 9/11 out of context to smear her
关于第二点，左派在Civil Right Movement的作用，可以说是贪功。事实上是全民性的纠偏，而不是所谓的左派发起，回归到1789年共和党全票通过，民主党一票未投的宪法第15修正案：所有美国公民有同等的投票权利！所以，1964年通过的，是Civil Right Act,而不是宪法修正案，其根基是完全立足于15修正案的。这得感谢1789年的共和党！
15修正案是南北战争后伴随着13（废奴），14（当时主要是针对黑人，赋予美国管辖的出生公民权）修正案而制定的，是美国黑人彻底翻身的宪法根基！这三大修正案中，共和党几乎全票通过，而民主党三大修正案统共只投下两票支持！之所以15修正案自1789年到1964年没有被践行，完全拜民主党所赐（在此期间，主党通过了Jim Crow Law, Segregation)!
回头再看Civil Right Act的投票支持率，共和党以82%（左右）的支持率完胜民主党的63%（左右）。