从今天的口头辩论来看,多数法官,包括保守派法官,对川普声称的他有这样基于1977年法律的权力表示怀疑。
A majority of Supreme Court justices on Wednesday asked skeptical questions about President Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner, casting doubt on a centerpiece of the administration’s second-term agenda.
During his rebuttal, Sauer, the solicitor general, argued that the tariffs are regulatory in nature, not taxes, and are “more effective if no one ever pays the tariff.”
That’s not really in line with the way President Trump has cast those duties, particularly as he heralds the possibility that he can raise trillions of dollars of revenue from them.
川普的律师发言后几个小时, 川普就在佛罗里达讲话,夸耀关税增加了多少收入。
Hours after the solicitor general said that tariffs are regulatory, not primarily intended to raise revenue and most effective if not paid, President Trump bragged at an event in Florida about the revenue generated by his policies. He said in a speech that tariffs had helped to raise “hundreds of billions of dollars.”