I agree with you about the South Africa. I'm against racial discrimination, but I'm also against uneducated and selfish black people become leaders and turn a great country into hell.
DFW-SUN 发表评论于 2012-11-09 06:46:33
It doesn't matter red or blue, it's time to work together and move forward!
天哪,这里的华人素质可真低。一天到晚就只会骂娘。可怜。
@787DL
"btw, who knows who's the Loser eventually? do you?"
Are you kidding me? is there a Loser/winner eventually? I know that Obama is the winner for this round, it's not a rumor, it's a fact, Romney already accepted lose. What are you talking about?
Geez, Republicans spent billions of dollars on attack ads, and got nothing, they lost president, they also lost in Senate, they lost several seats in the house, now the one that needs to worry is GOP, not Obama, he doesn't care anymore, he can't run for another presidency, he will do whatever he likes, only GOP has to work hard to prove they are not a bunch of useless craps so they won't lose house again. Also, Ron Paul didn't get any chance, why, because GOP is controlled by those social conservatives, which has no future, because younger generations don't share the views of social conservatives, it is not 1912, abortion is a choice, if you don't like it, don't do it, but force everyone to follow their belief, doesn't work anymore. GOP should understand that, and come up with some smart move, middle ground to win our independent votes. Blindly deny climate change is another example of how stupid the GOP had been to. Wake up, do something.
"连受过如此教育的国人,当在如此透明的选举结果不是自己期望时仍表现出不服、愤怒、咒骂及恶言相向,那对于中国占人口比例百分之七、八十受过很少教育的农民,你又能期望什么呢?结果只能有一个:暴动。"
Right on. We Chinese don't respect rules, not even trffic rules (just take a trip to China and you'll see what I'm talking about). Rule says the guy who wins the most votes should be the leader, but, to us this doesn't count if it's not OUR GUY. You don't give a sh*t about the rules, you don't get the democracy. Simple as that.
I voted for Romney is not due to I dislike O8. I like him, he is fun, funny, good looking, cool, relax and genuine.
I like Michelle Obama’s fashion style as well; she is tall, lean, polite and well-educated.
I like a lot of black people, my favorite movie star: Denzel Washington,my goodness, he is so charming! Basketball: Michael Jordan. Maya Angelou’s poem is very touching and soul searching. List on and on…
But I just don’t believe O8 is the best choice to lead this country.
Losers: Go, spend some of your money reminding you are still a rich guy! Meet Romney in dancing club, he is said to prepare for "dancing with stars". Watch out, don't bet, he will lose too :-).
da-piggest-stud 发表评论于 2012-11-08 20:44:49
"连受过如此教育的国人,当在如此透明的选举结果不是自己期望时仍表现出不服、愤怒、咒骂及恶言相向,那对于中国占人口比例百分之七、八十受过很少教育的农民,你又能期望什么呢?结果只能有一个:暴动。"
Right on. We Chinese don't respect rules, not even trffic rules (just take a trip to China and you'll see what I'm talking about). Rule says the guy who wins the most votes should be the leader, but, to us this doesn't count if it's not OUR GUY. You don't give a sh*t about the rules, you don't get the democracy. Simple as that.
"...very genuine"
Oh stop it. Grow up people! Billions spent just to trash the other guy and suddenly this, in less than an hour after OH turned to Blue? What's "genuine about it?! If you believe this you've got serious growing up to do! Being a little suspectful may not look so good to some but will always serve the society well - sh*t like CR will never happen when enough members of the society stay alert and smell the phoniness.
duffer 发表评论于 2012-11-08 20:08:39
Can't discuss any topic for 2 minutes without personal attack.
Shame on you!
ShamelessObama 发表评论于 2012-11-08 20:08:19
MantaRay
My passion is not on US politics. My passion is on disliking Obama, although it is not a good passion but I am forced to have it. I do feel better that Romney only got 48% popular votes - that makes me feel it is fairer than if Romney won the popular votes.
BTW, "suck" is a foul word when you don't know if Eveline is a woman or not.
Eveline 发表评论于 2012-11-08 20:05:30
Yup, duffer thanks for sharing. I like Ron Paul too. Too bad, people who are intelligent and truthful like him don't stand a chance.
MantaRay 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:57:38
To Shameless -
Maybe consider taking up US citizenship if you are so passionate about US politics?
Also going to the voting booth will make you feel better even if your guy lost. At least it did to me when Bush was elected, twice.
Great thing about USA is that each person might not be a genius, but collectively we are making it a pretty good place.
ShamelessObama 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:52:25
iceage2012
You attacked me last time. So please stop it now.
------------------------------------
go ahead, welcome to the US, that's democracy is all about, every citizen has a right to vote, for the time being, your noises doesn't count, got it?
iceage2012 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:43:44
Shameless,
go ahead, welcome to the US, that's democracy is all about, every citizen has a right to vote, for the time being, your noises doesn't count, got it?
一滴 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:42:56
“美国已分裂 难治理…”
已经开始准备下一个借口了吗?
不服不成,O8, 你太历害了.
ShamelessObama 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:40:07
iceage2012
I don't care what you think either. See you 4 years later when I will vote the one you don't.
------------------------
if you are not even US citizens, who cares what you think about US election?
iceage2012 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:35:49
Absolutely agree with DFW-SUN
For those whiners, if you are not even US citizens, who cares what you think about US election? yes, you have a right to make noises, but with a courtesy.
if you are US citizens, just accept the fact in January, the man who will swear under the oath will be OBAMA!
I like one of Newsweek comments " who cares Romney? people either vote for Obama or vote against Obama" But I do like Romney's concession speech, very gracious, very genuine, if he can be as genuine as he was at the concession moment during his campaign, he might have a chance. Regardless, history has already been made on Tuesday.
一滴 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:32:40
Thanks duffer for sharing:)
Ron Paul: 精辟, 尖锐, 一针见血.
我们中国也有类似讲法, 但过于直白,“吃人家的嘴短”
Eveline 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:31:54
MantaRay, why are you attack me for?
I think 787DL is very sharp. What's wrong with that? hahahaha
两个不是"几个".几个>2. 为什么不能瞎掺活?Anybody wants to restrict freedom of speech?
Anyway, enough with WXC. too much time wasted. so long.
roliepolieolie 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:18:24
duffer: for God's sake, do not copy and paste long articles here. Do you really think anyone would read it? I simply skipped it. For those interested, a hyperlink will do.
duffer 发表评论于 2012-11-08 19:12:10
Ron Paul: "Pure Democracy Is Dangerous"... When It's Purchased
From an outright libertarian, the headline seems contrary; but Ron Paul's affirmation that "pure democracy is dangerous" critically confirms what Romney accidentally admitted: that enabling the majority to dictate the minority is a problem when the majority are receiving a [government] check. Bloomberg TV's Betty Liu looks a little shocked when the thoughtful Paul confirms bluntly that the reelection of Obama is driven simply by 'the people' being on the 'receiving end' of government benefits and that the US is "so far gone; we're over the cliff already." From the lack of credibility in Washington to GOP's 'acceptance' of higher taxes and why he quit Congress, Ron Paul succinctly reminds many of the true state of the union in which we live... "As long as you think we have to please the world and run this welfare state, all we will argue about is who will get the loot."
duffer 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:52:29
A New Kind of Freedom
Nelson Hultberg
Karl Marx was asked once how he could justify advocating a political system of slavery for the individual, which is what socialism is. He replied that, socialism is not slavery; it is a "new kind of freedom." As all perceptive students of history know, the intellectuals of Europe bought into such Alice in Wonderland sophistry and plunged into the twentieth century nightmare of collectivist tyranny. But unfortunately so did American intellectuals about 30 years later when the Progressives of Woodrow Wilson's era established the Creature from Jekyl Island to usher in centralized government banking and the progressive income tax to "spread the wealth around."
Socialism is not really so bad, reasoned the American intellectual community. If we think about it, it actually is a "new kind of freedom." We just have to do what the Red Queen and the Mad Hatter advocated. We have to change the meaning of the words that define the fundamental values of our lives. After all, there is no objective reality; words can mean whatever we want them to mean. All we have to do is teach Marx's new definition of freedom to the young at an early enough age, and when they grow into adulthood they will not think of a government-dominated society as slavery at all. It will be a "new kind of freedom" to them.
Americans never bought into Lenin's violent revolutionary socialism, but they did buy into the Fabians' democratic evolutionary socialism. Fabian ideas in Britain were readily picked up by the American progressives and liberals of the twentieth century. This redefinition of values has been consuming us now for 100 years ever since the Creature from Jekyl Island and the tax revenuers took over Washington. The progressives and liberals have even redefined their redefinitions. Fascism, being basically the same as socialism, is now acceptable in the mix.
What is horrifying is that Barack Obama's election victory is tied directly to this corruption of values. We have now elected, for a second time, a man who was raised by communists in Hawaii. Obama's mind was forged from the likes of Frank Marshall Davis, a powerful and radical communist apparatchick of the fifties, sixties, and seventies. Davis was Obama's constant companion from the age of 9 to 18 before he went off to Occidental College in Los Angeles. His worldview is thus the Marxian sophistry that socialism is a "new kind of freedom." In the mind of Obama, individuals like Hank Rearden and Dagny Taggart are not entrepreneurial benefactors to their fellow man; they are evil rich people who exploit their fellow man. These evil rich need to be leveled down. And the way to do it is insidiously, governmentally with ever-expanding redistribution of wealth programs and ever-expanding monetary inflation.
One of Ayn Rand's powerful insights in Atlas Shrugged is that dictatorships take over because the people actually approve of them. She called it the "sanction of the victim." This attitude now permeates the American electorate. Nietzsche's "slave mentalities" dominate the throngs of voters that determine what our government is to do. The great majority of Americans are demonstrating that they actually want to be enslaved.
Rand also made the following observation: When asked once why she voted Republican if she thought both parties had sold out to collectivism, she replied that both parties are headed toward the abyss, but Democrats wish to charge toward it and Republicans wish to creep toward it. She, no doubt, felt that we have more time to educate the people as to what is happening with Republicans in power.
Well, America just ran out of time this past election night. A majority of American voters indicated that they believe government owes them a living along with health care, security, and self-esteem. They indicated that they are very comfortable with the Fabian march into socialist-fascism that has been taking place ever since the Creature was instituted in 1913. They indicated that they believe rich people don't earn their wealth; they steal it from the kindly masses by siphoning off the surplus productivity of their labor and reducing them to grinding poverty. (This is the fallacious "labor theory of value" that Marx perpetuated.)
Unfortunately this fallacious reasoning is why so many Americans have become so slothful and are choosing to vote for a living rather than work for a living. It is the reason why so many productive men and women in America are poisoned with guilt and now tolerate the egregious, confiscatory taxes that are destroying the dynamism of our economy and the sanity of our lives. Justice a... 查看完整评论
Let's face, Old US is gone. Now every 4 years, whoever can promise the most free stuff can win.
Look at Roomey, he believes a company like GM should not be bailed out, should be allowed bankruptcy, should let market to take care its self. And he lost Ohio and Michigan.
Now nobody will dare to say truth, only spineless crooks will lead this country.
duffer 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:40:12
Left or right are all relative speaking,
From Chairman Mao's view, Obama is way too right.
duffer 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:38:39
"洛杉矶时报在社论中说,奥巴马获胜不仅是因对手较弱,也是因为他防止了美国陷入衰退,并说服国会改革健保和金融业,他提出的未来国家道路也更合理。"
Full of left liberal's BS.
Obama ---> Karl Max reborn.
MantaRay 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:36:28
Eveline -
You suck!!!
787DL 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:29:25
DFW-SUN: "Yes, you do has the "right" to talk about it but You don't have rights to vote."
-- Mr. Citizen, I really don't have much time to waste. Good night and good luck with your O8!
obamanation 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:26:21
美国不是意识形态两极化,是极右,和偏右,根本没有左。
Eveline 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:26:05
787DL,You rock!!!
DFW-SUN 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:24:06
To 787DL,
Yes, you do has the "right" to talk about it but You don't have rights to vote.
Understand?
ShamelessObama 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:23:19
DFW-SUN
Don't you know the "you" here is not specifically you?
"I don't use your money and I paid income tax probably higher than your income!"
roliepolieolie 发表评论于 2012-11-08
First of all, Pro-Romney is a better way to describe it. Other than that, I guess you are right, but people need a place to vent their dissatisfaction.
---------------
In the meantime, some pro-GOP Chinese on this forum exhibited weak judgement, and inability to adapt. The train has already left station. You either move along, or will be let behind.
787DL 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:20:05
DFW-SUN: "If you are not US citizen, US election is none of your business. You don't have rights to vote."
--- I don't understand what you are talking about. I am still living here, and I think every legal tax payer has the "right" to talk about it. Right, Mr. Citizen?
DFW-SUN 发表评论于 2012-11-08 18:19:36
To Shameless,
"But Obama takes money from me to pay for things you guys use". I don't use your money and I paid income tax probably higher than your income!