别将道德滑坡的帽子套住同性恋人士头上或责任往他们身上推,往往越保守越口口声声讲道德的人士就是越道德滑坡道德败坏的。看看那么多一整天在电视上宣讲耶稣将世人从罪恶里面拯救出来的电视布道家,被人揭破其丑闻后才知这伙人的道德败坏。政客里面,共和党政客Newt Gingrich力吹Contract from America跟美国大众讲道德约束,他自己的家庭婚姻的“Contract”却一钱不值,人家形容他三个老婆的长相是从他妈到他姐到他女儿。就算是这次高院判决的9个大法官里面,最保守的那个Thomas也是贪心厌旧离婚再娶的,有什么道德家庭观念?尤其可恶的是他被不止一个女性控告性骚扰,而且指使老婆去电话恐吓证人,真是流氓法官一名,保守派所自吹自擂的道德观念家庭观念上哪儿了?
@瘦马 你真是恬不知耻,以为大家都是睁眼瞎吗?看看是谁先开始喷的。keep your opnions to yourself, because it's ignorant and stupid. 既然你出来喷,我自然也有权利反对咯。对你不是诅咒而是必然会发生的事。你真的会天真的认为你们家永远不会出一个同性恋?你将来和已经认识的人里没有同性恋?我就怕和你睡过的人里都有同性恋呢。呵呵
Jonathan Turley, the attorney who won the polygamy marriage case in Utah for Kody Brown and his four “Sister Wives” thinks the majority opinion “resonates” with the arguments he made to the Utah Supreme Court to decriminalize polygamous consensual relationships.
“The cases are actually different in that the Brown case is about the criminalization while today’s case was about recognition. We have not argued for recognition of plural marriages. Indeed, the Browns have never asked for multiple marriage licenses,” Turley said.
“Like many plural families, they have one state license for one marriage but chose to live as a plural family with “spiritual marriages.” In that sense, our case is more like Lawrence v. Texas that was handed down ten years ago.”