Queens Chrinicle 2013年十一月七日的文章：In response to a request for traffic calming measures on Cherry Avenue and Main Street in Flushing, which was the site on Oct. 3 of the tragic death of Allison Liao, 3, the city Department of Transportation has agreed to enhance safety there.
As part of the review, the DOT will remove two parking spaces at the Cherry Avenue eastbound approach north curb to provide easier visibility for left turning vehicles and add a “No Standing Anytime” sign and markings.
The DOT will also conduct a study on the feasibility of installing a signal that would give pedestrians more time to cross.
Mimimimi3 发表评论于
CCC333，虽然你的气愤从某种程度上可以理解，但你不觉得你的言语比起说风凉话的更加恶毒十倍不止？
CCC333 发表评论于
我也才去签名了。小女孩真可怜，希望大家都去签名。
在这里说风凉话的人，主你家人孩子被车撞死。
东突西突巴勒斯突 发表评论于
通过第3张照片可以看到这是横向道路正在做左转，明显老奶奶是“中国式过马路”所致。
李白 发表评论于
"关山飞度"是神经病。
Mimimimi3 发表评论于
读了Huffington Post和 Queens Chronicle的文章。文中说司机有绿灯。但行人有路权（right of way）。纽约市政府在惨案发生后决定去掉街角的两个停车位以便给左转车辆更好的视角。还会考虑加建一个行人过街的指示灯给行人过街。可见此路口原本没有行人过街指示灯。
刚看了google街景。事发地点是Cherry Avenue, Flushing, NY 左拐进 main st. 路口有行人指示灯。估计司机确实有路权（法官没有理由在有录像的情况下偏袒这个阿拉伯司机，除非法官本人是阿拉伯穆斯林。而且受害者家属都只要求民事赔偿）。不过，从录像看，小孩并没有像司机所说突然跑出来令他躲让不及。警察开的罚单 “Failing to Use Due Care” 和 “Failing to Yield to a Pedestrian”是对的，虽然你有路权，你也要 exercise due care and yield to pedestrian if possible.
Sign this petition
with 2,996 supporters
504 NEEDED
tiiannayuama 发表评论于
It is on a intersection of streets, not a freeway. No one has right to run pedestrian over, even if he/she has the green light. It is clearly a man-slaughter crime.
瞎眼的Blank, you are f* mental & stupid guy, go to google,
search----- NY State DMV Dismisses Tickets of Driver Who Killed Allie Liao
watch the video, you can shut up.
Re: '华人社区愤怒' --- 典型的无事生非. Let me waste a few more spit balls: The second picture shows a car was making a left turn from the opposite direction of the driver's lane. There was no car going straight in the driver's directions. This means the driver had a green light to turn LEFT! There were no pedestrians on the other side of the crossing despite the busy intersection and heavy traffic. This means the pedestrians were running a no-crossing red light. So how can a court find the driver guilty because by that ruling the driver's insurance company would pay through the roof? Will insurance company let the driver plead guilty or not contest such a ruling? All we can hope is the family is insured to claim some loss. This is a place of rule of law, and rule of rules, not rule of arbitrariness.
I have signed the petition. 552 signatures needed! Please Google change.org/p/eric-scheneiderman-justice-for-allison-liao to be signed!
To Blank:
Did you watch the video? Please google above the petition, you may be able to see the Title of article "Driver Kills 3-year-old In Queens, DMV Voids His Tickets ", to be read, and you will see the video.
The girl was struck by the SUV while she was hand to hand with her grandma by the front wheel roll over the head first, then the rear wheel roll over the leg. She and her grandma got the right way! she did not run into his car! She was innocent! The driver should watch them and to be yield! He had no regret, no guilty, even made a false statement, accuse the poor girl, and DMV believed his 100% lie! Are you drunk? You need be woke up!
'华人社区愤怒' --- 典型的无事生非：The video only strengthened the driver's case that he had a green light to make left turn, and the pedestrians were running a red light. There was no intention to do harm. It was a tragic accident of which the pedestrians were at fault. This should have nothing to do with the race or age of all people involved. Put yourself into the shoes of the driver and think again.