曾经黑人打劫我，我也想过杀了黑人，想想 他们命这么不值钱有必要 弄得自己成杀人犯吗! 说真的 黑人有几个是好的 ，在让我碰到 打劫我的黑人 我打断他们的狗腿 。奶奶的还学人抗议

支持公平判案,反对带着立场裁决，更反对明显不明显的种族歧视。 对没事儿给自己找抽的反感，没事儿给自己民族找敌人的纯属欠抽

我怎么感觉生活在肯尼亚。去死吧08！

煎饼：你应该为你的希特勒纳粹叫嚣感到可耻。为有你这样的败类同胞感到羞愧！

“。。。看看非洲，自从白人殖民地被赶走，黑人当家做主后，哪个国家不倒霉。美国的镜子呀。”
=================================================
有点意思。

美国已死，有事烧纸。

说白了，两个都是垃圾，害得全国上下为他们打的不可开交，真的是吃饱撑着。

接着闹

I wish that stupid woman who hold the sign of "Repeal Stand Your Ground Laws" good luck. She should be raped and killed if another Martin breaks into her house when there is no law to grant her right to defend herself.

In fact, the dead Martin was proven a burglar.

***spectator.org/blog/2013/07/15/trayvon-crime-school-miami

zimmerman，我看他的照片很难断定，混血混得厉害，但他的名字是德语，zimmer德语意思是房间。

黑白大战，黑白大战，
黄的就一边呆着去。

国家领导人煽动游行；这不是文革做法吗？

谁能告诉我是谁放进30万黑人在广州？广州快像南非了.

原来煽动暴乱的是O8，哈哈！

从本案角度上，我还是支持法庭判决，但象sdhaohan 这种动辄上纲上线还是表示难以理解。此公还是生活在文革中。

对于真正要在美国扎根，把美国当作家园的中国人来说，最重要的还是抱团， 互相扶持。 你可以argue要象黑人一样争取自己的利益， 但是种族牌打成这样， 你也许可以改变这个和几个案子的结果， 但是你改变不了你在人们心中的印象。 你改变不了你进了这个小区， 这个小区的人就跑光， 房产跌价的事实。 中国的发展道路和非默两裔都没有相似性。人口基数搞不上去。人又温顺。 他们唯一的做法只能是走精英路线， 多参政， 多掌握大公司。 就象尤太人不用和象西裔一样和非在街头争地盘， 但是千千万万黑人，老墨再为以色列打仗。

总体来说，美国的法制是健全的，法律也是有效的，在法制面前，任何人不得无赖。

同时，美国的人民也在不断的完善和健全自己的法制和法律。

美国人，美国各种民族的人们，都在意识到，尊重法律，执行法治，对任何民族都将是必要的，有意义的。

父老李大的白人司法部长说的好，你可以提高你的嗓门，但你不能举起你的拳头， 否则，一概法办。

黑人领袖，翟克森说的好，我们可以对法院判决不满，但我们不可以暴力抵抗。

茶叶党的创始人，黑人领袖说的好，你可以法院判决不满，但你不能发怒，你不能说美国法制的不公。

世界华人协会主席，无忧同志说的好，在美国，你要尊重警察，保安人员，配合他们的工作，不要无理取闹， 同时作为父亲的无忧，我们要教育我们的孩子，任何时候，不要跟手中有枪的人抵抗，要好汉不吃眼前亏。

人民必须明白，合议庭人员是控告方和被控告方的律师团队， 共同同意选举出来了，你必须服从合议庭人员的判决， 随便的就说，美国的法院的判决不合理，在很大程度上是没有道理的，是不成立的。 动不动就什么种族歧视，个人偏见以及个人或是某个集团， 某个群体的影响了法院判决，那你是太小看了美国人，美国的法制。

如果你实在觉得判决有问题，你可以上诉嘛， 或是再控告被告人的其他犯罪嘛， 但美国还有一条规定，你不能胡闹，更不能蔑视法庭，没有根据的控告他人， 你可能要受到法院的惩罚。

全是O8的政治手腕----Whack The Dog！转移话题。
现在没人再讲：
大使之死
IRS
医保
监听
埃及
O8当真高明！！！！！！！

拿这件事比较中国人进而慨叹中国人不团结的，其实也就是变相的“肤浅”和“幼稚”。 试问：中国人需要这样的团结吗？中国人应该“沦落”到这等万人唾弃的“无辜”吗？

为了被别人尊重我们无疑需要奋争，但是绝对不是这种形式的近似于流氓撒泼耍赖的“抗争”，有这个功夫，把法庭上的功课好好准备，打赢这个官司，那才叫一个扬眉吐气。为什么在法庭上理屈词穷节节败退，却跑到大街上泄愤胡闹？

这么闹下去，黑人有好果子吃？呵呵呵呵。

啥时候华人能如此团结？！
啥时候华人能够嗓门变大？！

为啥林俊被截肢，白凶手无罪释放，没
人示威？

普屎的结果

最后一张里老黑骂华裔警官“华克游”

21世纪的今天，美国种族歧视竟然如此猖獗，滥杀无辜竟然如此泛滥？！
=====================================================
Who are you kidding? You think you know better about this country and its people? get lost...

If you can read, it's easy for you to understand the case.

***edition***n***/2013/07/14/us/zimmerman-why-this-verdict/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

(CNN) -- Five key issues factored into George Zimmerman's acquittal Saturday in last year's shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin:
1. The charges filed
Did the prosecution make a mistake in filing a second-degree murder charge against Zimmerman?
"I think the problem was they overcharged it in the very beginning," said Holly Hughes, a criminal defense lawyer who was not on Zimmerman's legal team. Had prosecutors started with the manslaughter charge, the outcome might have been different, she told CNN.
But Florida State Attorney Angela Corey said the allegations "fit the bill" for the second-degree murder charge.

Second-degree murder is defined as a killing carried out with hatred, ill will or spite, but is not premeditated. To convict Zimmerman of manslaughter, jurors would have had to believe he "intentionally committed an act or acts that caused the death of Trayvon Martin."
A verdict and more: Get caught up
Questions surfaced about whether the charge was appropriate because knowing a person's feeling during a killing is difficult to prove.
As a result, the prosecution had to rely on the evidence to tell the story of what happened and what led to the shooting, HLN's Ryan Smith said.
Without an abundance of evidence, proving the case was difficult for both sides.
Former Los Angeles County prosecutor Loni Coombs emphasized that jurors did not find Zimmerman innocent; rather, they found him not guilty. There's a difference, she told CNN's Don Lemon.
"They're not saying he's innocent, they're just saying they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt, and therefore the law gave them no choice but to write 'not guilty,'" Coombs said.


2. The evidence presented
Zimmerman's account of what happened the night of the shooting was a central part of the trial. He was the only living person who witnessed the entire incident, and there wasn't much physical evidence for either team to fall back on.
Various adverse conditions played into the initial investigation that night: A dark, rainy scene isn't ideal for a homicide investigation, says HLN law enforcement analyst Mike Brooks.
Much was made during the trial about why there was so little blood on Martin and Zimmerman, who said he fired in self defense because he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Dr. Vincent Di Maio, a former medical examiner in San Antonio and an expert on gunshot wounds, testified that the rain could have washed away and affected evidence collected from Martin's hands.
Attorney Faith Jenkins said it doesn't matter what a prosecutor believes if he or she doesn't have adequate evidence.
"Trials are not necessarily about the truth all the time," the former prosecutor told CNN. "It's about what you can prove in court."
There was so little evidence available that the defense put together an animated video to re-enact the events of that night based on witness statements, police reports and Zimmerman's account, they said.
The judge ruled against the use of the video.
Zimmerman could still be held responsible for Martin's death.

3. The teen who spoke to Martin
She was on the phone with Martin moments before he was shot and was considered a key prosecution witness. But Rachel Jeantel initially resisted coming forward.

"She did not want to get involved in this in no way possible," Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump told reporters Saturday.

During two days of testimony that was at times tense and combative, Jeantel described her conversation with Martin.
When defense attorney Don West challenged her story, suggesting Martin attacked Zimmerman, she responded: "That's retarded."
Jeantel testified that Martin told her he was being chased by a "creepy-a** cracker."
"This was a disaster," criminal defense lawyer Mark Geragos told CNN's Anderson Cooper the day Jeantel testified. "This was the star witness, the star witness. The wheels came off and it was a train wreck. And there's no other -- there's no way to soft-pedal it."
Analysis: The race factor

4. The voice on the call
The mothers of Zimmerman and Martin each testified that screams for help heard on a 911 call the night of the shooting were those of her son.
Whose voice was heard on the call was considered key for both the prosecution and defense in proving who was responsible for the shooting. If the screams were Martin's, as the prosecution contended, Zimmerman was the aggressor. If the screams were Zimmerman's, as the defense said, Martin was the aggressor.
On July 5, in a packed courtroom, the prosecuti...  查看完整评论

我有幸和SSA办公室同一大楼，形形色色的人见太多了以后，我只能说，不是我想歧视那些人，而是那些人的行为实在无法让我不歧视。

Broedernoord：从你的言论看，你不过是一黑垃圾，作为韩人一员对你表示极端不屑！

黑人们一直以为美国永远欠它们的，子子孙孙不干活白吃福利，上学工作都靠AA，到处暴力犯罪，烂泥糊不上墙，还嫌美国对它们不好。干脆让奥黑子领着它们独立出去成立个黑人国好了，那里没有任何人歧视它们，不过也没有任何福利可吃了，一切得靠自己干活出力。不出3年，这些福利猪就都给饿成非洲猴啦。最好的例子参见利比里亚！

现在就等着有哪个人出头签署脱离黑人族群或是支持黑人独立的签名运动了，要是有这个机会俺第一个签名强烈支持！美国没有了黑人会更强大更富裕更安全更美丽！！！原来在国内，俺被土共洗脑，非常同情黑人的不幸命运，来美数年后，我和我的小伙伴们被美国黑人们的懒惰，贪婪，愚蠢，暴力犯罪和无所不在的抱怨种族歧视的贱相惊呆啦，现在俺变成了珍惜生命远离黑人族的一员。

If being black or talking about black means these dudes can ignore justice system, then ok, I discriminate them. And I am proud of it.

很遗憾，你们居然连掩饰一些的意愿都没有。

同感，这一点比事情的真相还要令人难过。

Broedernoord 你这个极端自卑加脑惨的亚人类， 经常被人搞所以已经精神错乱了。

会不会有这种情况黑人地位相当于二等公民， 白人相当于一等公民。 一等公民歧视二等公民？ 可能有。 我们也不否认这一点。

但是你这亚人类loser你懂不懂你他妈就是个三等公民， 一等二等都他妈歧视你。 二等歧视更厉害。 你这货懂不懂啊！ 你这货不自强， 将来连翻铁丝网的非法公民都能捏死你！

特想说一句，诸位的留言可以非常容易的看得出你们对黑人的歧视态度，不说谁对谁错，你们的用词，就非常明显的显现出来，你们根本就不是在就事论事，即便真理在你们那里，但是，对于黑人的反感占据你们思维的统治地位，也是你们判断对错90%的依据，在非裔和西裔人来说，你们更能接受西裔，虽然你们可能也看不起西裔，只是他们在你们心里更好一些。这是事实，很遗憾，你们居然连掩饰一些的意愿都没有。

看看最后一张照片，那个黑人小青年，反正我见了这样的要绕着走的。

一帮老黑借题发挥。其实抛开肤色就两小年轻打架，一个把另一个揍得不轻，另一个掏枪给他一枪，就一枪，结果揍人的命不好，死了! 按佛州法律这就是自卫，死了白死! 这种事老黑之间天天干，但他们都一个色儿的，死就死了。現在打死人的肤色浅了，老黑们就不依不饶的! 他们本质上讲就是暴民! 得不得就闹闹事。外加現在这傻B总统，言行上总想影响司法，这个国家这样下去好不了。看看非洲，自从白人殖民地被赶走，黑人当家做主后，哪个国家不倒霉。美国的镜子呀。

支持法庭對Zimmerman案的判決。这些示威游行是没腦子的無理取鬧！

先不管Zimmerman和Martin谁先引起争吵，但法医证明Martin身上除了枪伤就没其他伤痕，而Zimmerman后脑受击，鼻子骨折。而且有人証明看到Martin在地上騎著Zimmerman打。這都證明Zimmerman是被攻擊的一方。法医也证明Martin的枪伤是近距离由下往上打，和Zimmerman证词一至。

Zimmerman案的檢控方犯了幾個大錯。检控方先告的二级谋杀，在庭审结束后才临时追加误杀。本来于理不合，但法官了帮忙。检控方涉嫌作假及故意隐瞒部分对Martin不利的证据。这些都会令陪审团怀疑检控方的动机。

法庭上只认证据，检控方告的是刑事罪，所以举证和逻辑要滴水不漏，不可有任何可疑的地方。但检控方一连犯错，而且证据都对Martin不利。陪審員和法庭的判決没有任何問題！

其实，证据很清楚。不过很多人不愿意看证据，喜欢
自我洗脑，加上无良媒体和政客反复灌输。zimmerman
是不是innocent？ 当然不是。是不是二级谋杀？显然没有

支持-朕-。

黑人难道可以凌驾与法律之上？

21世纪的今天，美国种族歧视竟然如此猖獗，滥杀无辜竟然如此泛滥？！
=====================================================
劝您先看看审案过程再发评论，不要无的放矢！

下面的朕说的好.

种族是美国黑人惯打的一张牌。

判决是公正的。这些人瞎起哄。

一点也不觉得这个小孩冤死

周末走在街上，看到一群人在游行。旁观者赞成的，跟着喊两嗓子助威；不赞成的或不明就理的，则沉默。警察在周围维持秩序。别的一切照旧。我很感动。这才是制度自信，因为允许抗议本来是这个制度的有机部分，是被设计和建造在里面的，从第一天起。

21世纪的今天，美国种族歧视竟然如此猖獗，滥杀无辜竟然如此泛滥？！