个人资料
  • 博客访问:
归档
正文

zt 彭博社评论比闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》公正多了。

(2013-11-07 12:12:48) 下一个

彭博社评论比闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》公正多了。

 

 

来源: [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 369次
 

闾丘露薇认为华裔抗议是反美情绪,《铿锵三人行》则顾左右而言它刻意回避事件本质。闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》的评论,都有很明显的为JK洗地擦屁股的倾向,都是变相贬低华裔保护自身安全抵制种族歧视言论的合法行为。
 


 

相反,彭博社评论就比较客观了。彭博社评论指出JK剧就是一个不该播放的节目 ( It’s an offensive segment, and one that Kimmel and his producers should never have allowed to air.)彭博社评论完全理解华裔愤怒的抗议,认为6岁小孩也不应该说出种族灭绝的叫嚣( it’s not hard to understand why the Chinese and Chinese-American communities were so upset. Nationally televised jokes about racial extermination, even when made by six- and seven-year-olds, are rarely funny, especially if they’re directed at you. Even though to Americans (and probably to Kimmel) it might sound over the top to claim a child was publically advocating genocide, that’s what many Chinese heard.)


 

同样是新闻评论,都是就事论事,点评时事。对于JK剧言论的点评,彭博社评论员就不讳言其反人类种族主义的事实,而闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》却昧着良心为JK开脱。

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.