正文
牛津大学教授Richard Brent长期以来受聘于《亚洲数学月刊》（Asian Journal of Mathematics, 简称AJM）任编委。日前，他因不满杂志主编丘成桐先生诱逼编委会在三日内同意丘的学生的文章在三日内发表而愤然辞去AJM编委的职务。下面是他证实曹朱文章审稿程序违规的信件。
( )
[译文]：
我认为那段陈述（指《纽约客》关于曹朱文章审稿程序违规的报道）是正确的，尽管我不能确认准确的数字和日期了。
2006年4月23日我收到了下述邮件（指丘成桐要编委三天之内发表曹朱文章的邮件）。因为邮件没有附上论文摘要，所以编委根本无法作出评估。因为这篇论文不属于我的研究领域，所以我没有回复。后来别的一些编辑抄送了我一些邮件，但到那时候已经太迟了，因为论文已经发表了。
顺便说一下，作为我本人对此的一种反应，我最近辞去了《亚洲数学杂志》编委的职务。
您的,
Richard Brent
[英文原文]
I think the statement is essentially correct although I can't confirmthe precise numbers or dates.
On 23 April 2006 I received the following email. There was no paper or even abstract attached, so it's not clear on what basis the editors were meant to comment. Since the paper was clearly not in my area I did not reply. Later I was cc-ed in some emails by other editors, but by then it was too late as it seems that the paper had already been published.
By the way, partly in reaction to this controversy, I have recently resigned
from the editorial board of the AJM.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Brent
___________________________________________
Yau's letter to the Edotorial Board of AJM:
Dear Editors,
The paper The Hamilton-Perelman Theory of Ricci Flow --- the Poincare and geometrization conjectures by Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu has been read by Prof. S.T. Yau and he has recommended the paper be published in the Asian Journal of Mathematics.
I would be most grateful if you could send me your comments within the next three days. If no comments are received by then, the paper is considered accepted for publication.
Thank you very much for your help.
Very best regards,
S.T. Yau [注：S.T. Yau即丘成桐]
Raymond Chan
（供稿：义大于利） [首发,欢迎转载，请注明出处]- 支持此文作者/记者( )
( )
[译文]：
我认为那段陈述（指《纽约客》关于曹朱文章审稿程序违规的报道）是正确的，尽管我不能确认准确的数字和日期了。
2006年4月23日我收到了下述邮件（指丘成桐要编委三天之内发表曹朱文章的邮件）。因为邮件没有附上论文摘要，所以编委根本无法作出评估。因为这篇论文不属于我的研究领域，所以我没有回复。后来别的一些编辑抄送了我一些邮件，但到那时候已经太迟了，因为论文已经发表了。
顺便说一下，作为我本人对此的一种反应，我最近辞去了《亚洲数学杂志》编委的职务。
您的,
Richard Brent
[英文原文]
I think the statement is essentially correct although I can't confirmthe precise numbers or dates.
On 23 April 2006 I received the following email. There was no paper or even abstract attached, so it's not clear on what basis the editors were meant to comment. Since the paper was clearly not in my area I did not reply. Later I was cc-ed in some emails by other editors, but by then it was too late as it seems that the paper had already been published.
By the way, partly in reaction to this controversy, I have recently resigned
from the editorial board of the AJM.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Brent
___________________________________________
Yau's letter to the Edotorial Board of AJM:
Dear Editors,
The paper The Hamilton-Perelman Theory of Ricci Flow --- the Poincare and geometrization conjectures by Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu has been read by Prof. S.T. Yau and he has recommended the paper be published in the Asian Journal of Mathematics.
I would be most grateful if you could send me your comments within the next three days. If no comments are received by then, the paper is considered accepted for publication.
Thank you very much for your help.
Very best regards,
S.T. Yau [注：S.T. Yau即丘成桐]
Raymond Chan
（供稿：义大于利） [首发,欢迎转载，请注明出处]- 支持此文作者/记者( )
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.
