The distinction between being "street smart" and "book smart" lies in their innate responses and rational understanding when encountering a situation. Here's a breakdown of the differences:
-
Street smart individuals tend to be sensitive to emotional responses in dealing with people. They are quick to grasp the nuances of social interactions. For instance, economists and entrepreneurs differ in their approaches; the former are often book smart, while the latter are considered street smart. While economic theories may take time to apply practically, street smart individuals excel in the immediacy of real-world business operations.
-
Book smart individuals are more attuned to the principles behind various matters, often in a generalized manner. However, they may lack sensitivity to specific, current issues.
-
The approach to communication can vary; whether to start with emotions or rationality, emphasizing either the heart or the mind.
-
The downside of being book smart may become apparent immediately as it can delay action due to overthinking.
-
On the other hand, the drawbacks of being street smart may not surface until years later, as seen in the example of individuals who prioritize immediate gains without considering long-term consequences. For instance, a couple composed of a financially savvy, yet uneducated wife and an educated, but financially struggling husband, may face challenges due to their differing perspectives and skill sets. Despite the potential for complementarity, their differences may lead to conflict.
Despite the prevalence of the term "street smart" in contemporary discourse, true street smarts encompass more than just manual dexterity and practical skills. It involves adeptly managing interpersonal relationships, including those within a marriage. Hence, according to the definition found through a Google search, the wife in the example may not fully embody street smarts.
Before the widespread use of the term "street smart," I equated it with thinking fast, while viewing book smart as thinking slow. This aligns with the theory proposed in "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman, which distinguishes between intuitive, emotional judgments (system 1) and logical, rational thinking (system 2). Both systems have their strengths and weaknesses.
Reflecting on past experiences, I once admired a female superior for her quick reactions, considering it a valuable trait. However, she humbly acknowledged that her rapid responses were not always beneficial, as they sometimes alienated others. She emphasized the importance of slowing down, suggesting that being too quick-witted can have its drawbacks. Her words left a lasting impression, highlighting the value of balancing quick thinking with thoughtful consideration.
As I delve deeper into this topic, I realize its complexity and the multitude of perspectives and examples it encompasses. Each combination of street smarts and book smarts presents its own set of cases, both positive and negative. Therefore, it's essential to engage in discussions and explore the nuances of these concepts further.
** definition of street smart vs book smart and provide me with examples, by extrapolate below notes: "
这两者的差别何在？碰见一件事儿，有人的本能情绪反应vs理性认识。与人互动大概就是两方面：晓之以理，动之以情。不管哪个
回答:
【龙年卜卦】市井聪明&书本聪明的夫妻组合 由
邵丰慧 于
2024-02-05 12:46:08
smart，大概都要两方面兼顾才能完美解决问题。
差别大概是：
1. street smart, 对人的感性反应比较敏感。说的大点，经济学家和企业家不同，前者是book smart，后者是street smart. 具体经营需要时间，而理论问题对时间不敏感，可以慢慢想
2. Book smart 对“事情的”道理比较敏感，比较普遍化，但对特殊的、具体当下的事情不太敏感。
3. 上来，先谈感情，还是闲谈道理。先说脑袋，还是先说屁股。
4. book smart 的缺点当下就能显现，因为太慢耽误事儿。
5. street smart 的缺点不太明显，要到多年后拐了一个大弯后恶果才显现。当年打天下分田分地真忙，能立即解决问题，绝对的street smart。这个恶果要到几十年后才显现出来---中国人的道德都被彻底破坏了。
邵丰慧发过的热帖：
