不过这个事件给中国政府提了醒:
一个是基层领导的素质有待提高,粗暴不是解决问题的途径,把农民压抑的太久了张光诚李光诚白坎灰坎的会层出不穷,会严重的打击公民对政府的信心。dont let the cat get out of the bag, 但现在猫已经爬出来了,对各级领导的水平和能力提出了更高的要求。
二是网络言论:
能不能改变下思路?封锁关键词的手段也许在上个世纪有些用处,但现在实在是有些幼稚和可笑。能不能与时俱进? 把网络用户管理好,你什么都可以说,但政府知道是谁说的,你本人也知道要为自己的网络言论负责。一味的封锁第一是封不住,同时会给公民造成逆反心理,和政府玩猫捉老鼠,大家都在看政府的笑话。
三就是,人权问题也需要重视下了。给大家讲话的平台,给大家一个沟通的渠道,现在的百姓已经具备正常的思维和沟通能力了,连陈都可以直接和美国国会通话,那中国政府为什么不多给点自己的国民些说话的权利呢?
四就是中国的计划生育政策。这个政策执行了这么多年,造成恶劣的国际影响,对家庭的的沉重打击,对腐败的滋生蔓延,对道德的败坏和沦丧。。。。。。是不是一定要坚持这种非人道的政策?
一己之见,希望国家稳定大家生活幸福。
看了CBS上美国读者对这个听证会新闻的评论, 不太乐观陈现在的前景。 比如有人问“If Chen is such a brilliant, thoughtful dissident, why didn't it occur to him BEFORE he made his dash for the US embassy that his escape might have bad consequences for members of his family? And why does his family keep getting larger each time he talks to another western news agency? (Now he's worrying about his brothers?) ” “If the Chinese government is "isolating" this guy and even the U.S. Embassy can't talk to him on the phone, how come we keep getting speeches, requests, and demands from him all day?” 陈如果真的被流放到美国其实是有利中共的结局, 现在连美国的普通人似乎都已意识到这一点。 至于有话说的比较mean点的发言“What kinda BS is this! How many other people can call congress and ask for free trip in? I can't even call into congress . What a BS stunt ... let him go work at a iphone factory”后附和的那批人里有没有共和党人? 说不准。