Obama is a man with a loving heart and compassion while the arrogant Republican white elites are dead inside. they could spend billions on wars but don't want to spare a penny to the poor. they pocket huge oil money and ignore global warming, and they'd rather throw food into seas than let the poor have a piece of bread. they laugh at your skin color, your accent, your looks, your height, your culture, your religion, your weight, your income, your career, your marital status, your sexual orientation, your hair style, the way you walk, ... you name it. everything has a code, a Republican code. if you don't follow that code, you're screwed. they'd do everything to change you or eliminate you if you refuse to change.
谁赢？
Wall Street Journal Political Diary contributors offer their predictions for Election Day.
Robert L. Pollock, Wall Street Journal editorial board member.
Mitt Romney will win the presidency with a comfortable majority of more than 300 Electoral College votes. Ohio will not be decisive because other Midwestern states—possibly including Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota and Michigan—will fall into the Romney camp. So will Colorado, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire and, likely, Pennsylvania.
Why? I'm going with the general rule of the thumb that incumbent presidents who can't get themselves above 50% in the polls do not win. I'm also assuming presidents running for re-election in an economy as bad as ours do not win. Polls showing a close race are based on samples with a Democratic bias.
Mr. Romney is the most articulate candidate the GOP has put forward since Ronald Reagan. Although he is not the kind of small-government conservative that excites the Republican base, the base is confident that he is serious about tackling our debt crisis and repealing ObamaCare. He is also viewed favorably by independents. If he cannot win in an economy like this one, it would mean that the composition of the electorate has changed in such a way that the current GOP coalition will probably never elect another president.
Is there any reason to believe the electorate has changed in such a way? No. Look at the tea party and the congressional results from 2010. Look at the recent Gallup numbers showing a decisive shift in self-identified party affiliation toward the GOP between 2008 and 2012.
But Republicans should not get cocky when they win. One of the smartest things a President Romney could do would be common-sense immigration reform to make Hispanics—many of whom have conservative values—more comfortable voting for the party. That would help keep the GOP coalition viable for decades to come.
Just voted for Obama!!! Pray for him, and he will WIN!!!
Ding "在平庸与邪气之间，我愿意选择平庸
jjin09061999 发表评论于 2012-11-06 10:11:13
iceage2012 - Me too!
Just voted for Obama!!! Pray for him, and he will WIN!!!
Ding "在平庸与邪气之间，我愿意选择平庸"
丹尼外婆 发表评论于 2012-11-06 10:06:53
奥夫人没有为丈夫添分，四年来负面新闻不少。
roliepolieolie 发表评论于 2012-11-06 10:02:48
Those labelling Obama supporters as dependents on government handouts are plain absurd and outright laughable! Do you idiots know Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, the #1 and #2 wealthiest Americans are staunch Obama supporters too? What kind of welfare benefits do they hope to get from the Obama administration? In fact, their charitable donations make ANY republican pale in comparison!
I don't think any Chinese, including you die-hard Romney followers, vote for Obama or Romney in hope of the government handouts. It's a difference in vision for the country.
Stop the BS, and focus on logics if you hope to convince someone to support Romney. I voted for Obama as he will lead the country into prosperity. I have seen Bill Clinton delivered it, and I know Obama will too.
goodhunter 发表评论于 2012-11-06 09:53:33
奥巴马似乎赢定了。虽然不喜欢他，但得多数者得天下，就像老毛一样。
heshen 发表评论于 2012-11-06 09:47:02
muslim style
lake_michigan 发表评论于 2012-11-06 09:45:29
It all boils down to a matter of priority when I am forced to pick the lesser of two evils: abhorrent social agenda borrowed from medieval theologians, or trickle-down government fiscal agenda simulating last century socialism experiments.
The priority of the country is economy, so I voted for Romney.
CBS transcript: Obama wouldn't call Benghazi terrorism
On the eve of the presidential election CBS News program 60 Minutes released a transcript of an interview with President Obama on September 12, 2012 in which he said it was "too early to tell" whether the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya was an act of terrorism.
The statement appears to contradict Obama's claim in a second debate with GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he identified the Sept. 11 attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans as a terror attack the day after it happened.
