评论: 华尔街日报:美国大选巅峰之夜的五大看点(组图)

只有登录用户才能发表评论,点击此处登录    返回新闻帖
长在红旗下 发表评论于 2012-11-06 10:32:12
谁赢?
Wall Street Journal Political Diary contributors offer their predictions for Election Day.
Robert L. Pollock, Wall Street Journal editorial board member.

Mitt Romney will win the presidency with a comfortable majority of more than 300 Electoral College votes. Ohio will not be decisive because other Midwestern states—possibly including Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota and Michigan—will fall into the Romney camp. So will Colorado, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire and, likely, Pennsylvania.

Why? I'm going with the general rule of the thumb that incumbent presidents who can't get themselves above 50% in the polls do not win. I'm also assuming presidents running for re-election in an economy as bad as ours do not win. Polls showing a close race are based on samples with a Democratic bias.

Mr. Romney is the most articulate candidate the GOP has put forward since Ronald Reagan. Although he is not the kind of small-government conservative that excites the Republican base, the base is confident that he is serious about tackling our debt crisis and repealing ObamaCare. He is also viewed favorably by independents. If he cannot win in an economy like this one, it would mean that the composition of the electorate has changed in such a way that the current GOP coalition will probably never elect another president.

Is there any reason to believe the electorate has changed in such a way? No. Look at the tea party and the congressional results from 2010. Look at the recent Gallup numbers showing a decisive shift in self-identified party affiliation toward the GOP between 2008 and 2012.

But Republicans should not get cocky when they win. One of the smartest things a President Romney could do would be common-sense immigration reform to make Hispanics—many of whom have conservative values—more comfortable voting for the party. That would help keep the GOP coalition viable for decades to come.
长在红旗下 发表评论于 2012-11-06 09:28:26
看看08时怎样睁着眼说瞎话的吧!这可是人命关天的事。美国领事被杀,08找借口怪youtube video. 左派新闻包辟直到昨天才发表。这样的人还说别人不可信!天大的笑话!

CBS transcript: Obama wouldn't call Benghazi terrorism
On the eve of the presidential election CBS News program 60 Minutes released a transcript of an interview with President Obama on September 12, 2012 in which he said it was "too early to tell" whether the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya was an act of terrorism.
The statement appears to contradict Obama's claim in a second debate with GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he identified the Sept. 11 attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans as a terror attack the day after it happened.

***courier-journal/usatoday/article/1684503?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Home|s
长在红旗下 发表评论于 2012-11-06 08:42:09
从来没有一个总统一口一个我我我的(I, I, I, not we we we)。从来没有一个这么自爱的总统,只会表演。明天他的正式工作是演员。


I voted for change, character, better jobs and a better economy. I voted for a brighter future for our posterity and new hope. I voted for a smaller federal government and a balanced responsible budget. I voted for accountability, transparency, leadership and a record of of bi partisanship. I did not vote for Obama - I voted for Romney!
AAC 发表评论于 2012-11-06 01:53:43
有趣,堕胎合法不表示堕胎正确。政府不管上帝的问题
页次:1/1 每页50条记录, 本页显示14, 共4  分页:  [1]