2014-04-23 02:53:07 by Xuansan
再次给论坛xdjm扫扫盲：1，别人的错误不能成为你犯错的理由，更不能成为你侮辱妇孺、野蛮霸道、非法拦阻的借口！有些论点说因为大陆人经常这样做所以港人怎么怎么，就是这个混账逻辑。幼儿随地便溺不对但既然你看到这个现象为何不增加公共服务设施而只是责骂别人素质？你不是管理最好吗？最文明吗？2，文明必须以文明方法来显示、通过帮助弱小来显示而不是靠野蛮和无理。野蛮只能带来野蛮，目的和手段是一致的。所以就不要把港人的龌龊行为原因全推到大陆人身上，这是一种无知也是不自知的可怜！3，人生平等，尽管实际做不到但人格尊严平等和维护这个人格尊严应该是文明共识。我犯错认罚但你不能侮辱我的人格尊严，港人不是在过去殖民地修养的很好吗？怎么还是封建时代一犯法即剥夺尊严的腐朽思想一样？为了尊严而战是光荣的。这也就是如此事发生在美国，美国父亲100%会拔枪维护家人尊严然后再到法庭承担后果。从而这几个港痞估计打死都不敢去美国做同样的事！4，大家是对等的。你到我这里来我就应该可以去你那里，你来大陆包二奶三奶开启了极坏的风气我去你那里犯个错就上纲上线，什么蝗虫等污蔑性恶语其实是港人自己的耻辱！一个不如何尊重他人的团体和个人也必将在别人心目中臭不可闻沦为shit！
你觉得一个二岁小孩有辨别什么是公众场合什么是私人场合的能力吗？你觉得小孩是有意识把自己私处暴露在公众场合吗？他要真有这个意识就是神童了，呵呵
……………………
1039 发表评论于 2014-04-23 10:15:24
打倒土豪 发表评论于 2014-04-23 07:01:52
读得懂吗？需要翻译一下吗……呵
The United States enacted the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 to punish those who intentionally capture an individual's private areas without consent, when the person knew the subject had an expectation of privacy.
没看懂的是你自己吧，呵呵。"expectation of privacy" 你没明白吧。 在上千人的闹市大街脱裤子，在所有路人面前公然大便，自己主动暴露给公众，是没有expectation of privacy的。
打倒土豪 发表评论于
你觉得一个二岁小孩有辨别什么是公众场合什么是私人场合的能力吗？
……………………
1039 发表评论于 2014-04-23 10:15:24
打倒土豪 发表评论于 2014-04-23 07:01:52
读得懂吗？需要翻译一下吗……呵
The United States enacted the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 to punish those who intentionally capture an individual's private areas without consent, when the person knew the subject had an expectation of privacy.
没看懂的是你自己吧，呵呵。"expectation of privacy" 你没明白吧。 在上千人的闹市大街脱裤子，在所有路人面前公然大便，自己主动暴露给公众，是没有expectation of privacy的。
抱着仙人掌 发表评论于
看看外国人的评论，真是侮辱咱们啊
China uses the whole world as their toilet so I guess this is normal...everything including animals are there for the comfort and use of the Chinese..sorry to say but they are the most self serving culture on earth.
接着The right of privacy has been described as “the right to be left alone.” It arises solely from law established by court decisions. In many states, including Missouri, there are no statutes in that address the right of privacy; the right has been created through court decisions. Violation of one’s right of privacy is considered a “tort” or civil wrong that gives rise to the right to sue in state court for damages, an injunction, or both. In most, if not all, jurisdictions, only a natural person, not a legal entity such as a corporation, enjoys a right of privacy.
打倒土豪 发表评论于
多学学美国法律，省得以后学那个港怂乱拍被别人告上法庭还不知怎么回事……呵呵，那傻 x拍了人家私处了，那对夫妇应赶紧去上告！
Many places have laws prohibiting photographing private areas under a person's clothing without that person's permission. This also applies to any filming of another within a public restroom or locker room. Some jurisdictions have completely banned the use of a camera phone within a restroom or locker room in order to prevent this. The United States enacted the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004 to punish those who intentionally capture an individual's private areas without consent, when the person knew the subject had an expectation of privacy.[41] Additionally, state laws have been passed addressing the issue as well.[42]
…………………………1……
The right of privacy has been described as “the right to be left alone.” It arises solely from law established by court decisions. In many states, including Missouri, there are no statutes in that address the right of privacy; the right has been created through court decisions. Violation of one’s right of privacy is considered a “tort” or civil wrong that gives rise to the right to sue in state court for damages, an injunction, or both. In most, if not all, jurisdictions, only a natural person, not a legal entity such as a corporation, enjoys a right of privacy.
hbyzy 发表评论于
when all white colour country try to block china grow up, uae any worth method, some hongkong stupid follow them,what they want to get?
I can not type Chinese in this computer, sorry
wiki:
United Kingdom[edit]
Legal restrictions on photography[edit]
In particular, the Protection of Children Act 1978 restricts making or possessing pornography of under-18s, or what looks like pornography of under-18s. However, the taking of photographs of children in public spaces is not illegal.
看到最后一句没有，However, the taking of photographs of children in public spaces is not illegal.如果你有确切的英国法律条款，请提供以正视... 查看完整评论
United States[edit]
Public property[edit]
It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public property.[39]
Photographing or videotaping a tourist attraction, whether publicly or privately owned, is generally considered legal, unless explicitly prohibited by a specific law and/or statute.
看到没有？It is legal to photograph or videotape ANYTHING and ANYONE on ANY public property.