In checking your manuscript submitted to Scientific Reports it has come to our attention that the following must be addressed before we can process your submission:
-- Scientific Reports uses the term‘Greater China’ to describe a map that includes Taiwan. Please could you use the term ‘Greater China’ to describe your map in text, legends and labels?If you prefer not to make these changes, please email your reason to scientificreports@nature.com
Your paper has been placed back in the Author Approval Folder; you may access it viathe following link:
To makecorrections to any of the files follow the “Modify Manuscript Files” link. If you need to amend any of the current information in the online submissionsystem follow the link “Modify Manuscript Data”.
If you need to upload new/replacement files please ensure that you have validated and approved the files and clicked on the final ‘Approve Submission’ button toreturn the manuscript to the quality check stage.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact us.
It is Scientific Reports' practice to omit the nine-dash line from articles, unless inclusion of the line is essential to the scientific context of the paper (for background see http://www.nature.com/nature/ journal/v478/n7369/full/ 478285a.html). Please could you remove the nine-dash line from your map? If you feel that inclusion of the line is essential, please state your reason via email to scientificreports@nature.com.
[142]WCYC 2016-8-20 14:20 to 王毅翔: 你不要以为在港科大做PI就有多高人一等,你的见识与有些理念不比那些港校里带头闹事的学生会头目、泛独派头目高多少。还是那句话,爱国、维护国家利益,这是科研人的第一原则,你可以不爱党(正如我对gcd不感冒一样),但如果损害国家利益,没有几个人会认同你的言论或观点。 -- but I am not a Chinese citizen, though I love Chinese people. there is no need for me to love or dislove mainland China as a country.